Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people argue that higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher industrial pollution, whereas others argue that there are better ways to deal with it. Discuss both view and give opinion v.2

Some people argue that higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher industrial pollution, whereas others argue that there are better ways to deal with it. 2
In today’s industrialized world where environmental pollution caused by industries have reached unprecedented levels. To encounter this, certain section of the society recommends imposing higher corporate taxes. Whereas, others have contrasting views, of imposing threshold pollution levels irrespective of taxes. In my opinion, imposing additional taxes is a good option. However, for optimum results, a combination of both stricter policies alongside higher taxes must be imposed. Firstly, tax revenues generated from industries can be better utilized by governments on repairing the damages made to the environment. Furthermore, money from taxes can be utilized in research activities, with an aim of reducing pollution. Secondly, as a result of mandating higher taxation policies, companies shall strive to improvise the production processes, with an aim of reducing the pollution. Consequently, pollution would be drastically reduced at first place. For instance, Coal India which is India’s largest producer of coal, has successfully re-engineered the coal production process, as a result of strict financial repercussions from government. On the other hand, simple step of imposing higher taxes is not an optimum solution, as in current competitive world, companies can exploit this policy by multiplying the production without considering the environmental damages, as long as they are capable of paying increased tax rates. This trend would have devastating results in longer run. For instance, plastic products are known to be biggest destructor of ecosystem, at the same time it highly lucrative business. Therefore, allowing plastic producers to produce plastic without restrictions can lead to serious environmental destructions. To conclude, even though collecting higher taxes on environmental grounds is a good option. However, a maximum threshold of allowed pollution must be imposed on industries. More importantly, such a fine balance between tax and threshold would allow governments to come up with solutions to fight back the calculated the expected threshold level of pollution.
In
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
today
’s industrialized world where
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
caused by industries have reached unprecedented levels. To encounter this, certain section of the society recommends
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
imposing
higher corporate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
taxes
. Whereas, others have contrasting views, of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
imposing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
threshold
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
levels irrespective of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
taxes
. In my opinion,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
imposing
additional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
taxes
is a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
option.
However
, for optimum
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
results
, a combination of both stricter policies alongside higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
taxes
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be imposed
.

Firstly
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
revenues generated from industries can be better utilized by
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
on repairing the damages made to the environment.
Furthermore
, money from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
taxes
can
be utilized
in research activities, with an aim of reducing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
.
Secondly
, as a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
result
of mandating higher taxation policies,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
shall strive to improvise the production processes, with an aim of reducing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
.
Consequently
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
would be
drastically
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduced
at
first
place.
For instance
, Coal India which is India’s largest producer of coal, has
successfully
re-engineered the coal production process, as a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
result
of strict financial repercussions from
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
.

On the other hand
, simple step of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
imposing
higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
taxes
is not an optimum solution, as in
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
competitive world,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
can exploit this policy by multiplying the production without considering the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environmental
damages, as long as they are capable of paying increased
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
rates. This trend would have devastating
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
results
in longer run.
For instance
, plastic products
are known
to be
A determiner is probably missing here: "the biggest".
biggest
Possible spelling mistake found.
destructor
of ecosystem, at the same time it
highly
lucrative business.
Therefore
, allowing plastic producers to produce plastic without restrictions can lead to serious
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environmental
Possible spelling mistake found.
destructions
.

To conclude
,
even though
collecting higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
taxes
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environmental
grounds is a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
option.
However
, a maximum
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
threshold
of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
allowed
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be imposed
on industries. More
importantly
, such a fine balance between
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
threshold
would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
allow
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
come
up with solutions to fight back the calculated the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
expected
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
threshold
level of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
.
17Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
33Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes

IELTS essay Some people argue that higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher industrial pollution, whereas others argue that there are better ways to deal with it. 2

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
306 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts