Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people argue that companies and private individuals,rather than government, should pay the bill of pollution.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people argue that companies and private individuals, rather than government, should pay the bill of pollution. 9LW3W
Pollution has become the most problematic issue that draws attention from worldwide. Few people opine that businesses and individuals should pay for the bill of pollution rather than the governments. I disagree with the given statement and my supporting views are outlined in the forthcoming paragraphs. To begin with, it may not be possible to say who is to blame. It would be very difficult to pin point the extent to which each one has to pay for pollution. Such businesses will find loopholes to avoid heavy bills. Therefore, the government should take the onus of handling the pollution costs. Secondly, the big companies may be unwilling to accept the responsibility of paying the additional bill of pollution by saying that they are already paying heavy taxes to the government. They could also argue that they are assisting the governments indirectly by aiding many charity organization. What is more, in places where governments have tried this policy and successfully prosecuted the companies who violated the law, it took years to get the result. Therefore, it would be very unpractical to make companies and individuals to pay the bill of pollution. The governments could, however, make it mandatory for companies to set up effluent treatment plants and subsidize them greatly so as to increase compliance of the companies to set them up. To conclude, pollution is a serious and the government should not leave it to the individual and companies to pay its bill. Whereas, it can make it mandatory for the companies to set up effluent treatment plants so that pollution is minimized.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Pollution
has become the most problematic issue that draws attention from worldwide. Few
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
opine that businesses and individuals should
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pay
for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bill
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
rather
than the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments
. I disagree with the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
statement and my supporting views
are outlined
in the forthcoming paragraphs.

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, it may not be possible to say who is to blame. It would be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
difficult to pin point the extent to which each one
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
has to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pay
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
. Such businesses will find loopholes to avoid heavy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bills
.
Therefore
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
should take the onus of handling the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
costs.
Secondly
, the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
may be unwilling to accept the responsibility of paying the additional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bill
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
by saying that they are already paying heavy taxes to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
. They could
also
argue that they are assisting the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments
indirectly
by aiding
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
charity organization.

What is more
, in places where
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments
have tried this policy and
successfully
prosecuted the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
who violated the law, it took years to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
the result.
Therefore
, it would be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
unpractical to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
and individuals to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pay
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bill
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments
could,
however
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
it mandatory for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
to set up effluent treatment plants and subsidize them
greatly
'So as to' expresses purpose and is used in formal texts. Consider using "to"
so as to
increase compliance of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
to set them up.

To conclude
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
is a serious and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
should not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
leave
it to the individual and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pay
its
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bill
. Whereas, it can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
it mandatory for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
to set up effluent treatment plants
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
is minimized
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people argue that companies and private individuals, rather than government, should pay the bill of pollution.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
263 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts