In the contemporary society art considerably important from the ancient times. Some masterpieces which are well paid and help the creator to build their reputation whereas many others have to take pains to earn it. There is a strong argument that the authority should take some effort to gain balance of this inequitable problem. In my opinion, i totally disagree with this notion. It is undeniable that artists are more able to manage and use their time as well as possible. They can see their activity which can help them to remember the structure of their job. As a result, it can clear why artists can collect more money through their creativity than others. Moreover, artists can be more able to maximize and improve their prospects which they have. Everybody has potential which has to be maximized for being better because talent is one of the important thing in catnching success. For instance, most professional painter attend painting courses in order to get the best result of their painting and become famous painter. So, it becomes enermous evidence that artists are smart to heighten their self prospects and easy to make more money. In addition to this, earning money depend on every artists' inspiration and talent. If the government take some measures to equal earning money, competition can not ignored among professional creators. And also, if all arts is equally estamated by organisation. locality can not figure out the best art. As a result, everybody condemn government in this action and skillful artists are not appreciate by public. To conclude, some artistic people are paid quite well for their efforts, whereas the majority find it difficult to obtain work or to sell their arts. In my opinion, even though some people suffer from low income, fhe government can not take steps to make salary between artists.
In the contemporary society
art
considerably
important
from the ancient times.
Some
masterpieces which are well paid and
help
the creator to build their reputation whereas
many
others
have to
take pains to earn it. There is a strong argument that the authority should take
some
effort to gain balance of this inequitable problem. In my opinion,
i
totally
disagree with this notion. It is undeniable that
artists
are more able to manage and
use
their time
as well
as possible. They can
see
their activity which can
help
them to remember the structure of their job.
As a result
, it can
clear
why
artists
can collect more
money
through their creativity than others.
Moreover
,
artists
can be more able to maximize and
improve
their prospects which they have. Everybody has potential which
has to
be maximized
for being better
because
talent is one of the
important
thing in
catnching
success.
For instance
, most professional painter attend painting courses in order to
get
the best result of their painting and become
famous
painter.
So
, it becomes
enermous
evidence that
artists
are smart to heighten their self prospects and easy to
make
more
money
.
In addition
to this, earning
money
depend on every artists' inspiration and talent. If the
government
take
some
measures to equal earning
money
, competition can not
ignored
among professional creators. And
also
, if all
arts
is
equally
estamated
by
organisation
.
locality
can not figure out the best
art
.
As a result
, everybody
condemn
government
in this action and skillful
artists
are not
appreciate
by public.
To conclude
,
some
artistic
people
are paid
quite well for their efforts, whereas the majority find it difficult to obtain work or to sell their
arts
. In my opinion,
even though
some
people
suffer from low income,
fhe
government
can not take steps to
make
salary between
artists
.