My friend the other day was complaining about her manager texted my friend on weekends. This kind of behaviour made me think whether contacting staff without limitations is correct. Although frequent interacting with employees contributes to corporations, in my opinion, this kind of conduct from employers brings more disadvantages.
On the one hand, keeping interactions with staff in their leisure time results in detrimental impacts for individuals and corporations. Firstly, as employers can contact their employees with no restrictions, in order to avoid missing any crucial announcements, staff cannot turn off their work phones. Consequently, employees do not have ample time to enjoy personal life, which imbalances individuals’ personal and work life. Besides, once one manager is admissible to contact teammates with no boundaries, other team leaders who want employees to have additional workload will follow the same conducts. Therefore, there will be unhealthy company cultures cultivated in corporations.
On the other hand, contacting employees benefits corporations’ competitiveness. Since managers can contact staff at any time, employees might be required to work when urgent situations occur. Meanwhile, once employees assure vital projects be accomplished efficiently and be finished in advance, companies can be more productive and be more competitive among peer corporations. In contrast, if businesses contact staff at any time, in a number of countries, this kind of behaviour will violate the labour law. For instance, in Canada, the government regulates that employees are not obligated to work in their spare time.
In conclusion, despite keeping in control of employees without restrictions can benefit companies, there are more drawbacks for individuals and corporations.
My friend the other day was complaining about her manager texted my friend on weekends. This kind of
behaviour
made me
think
whether contacting
staff
without limitations is correct. Although frequent interacting with
employees
contributes to
corporations
, in my opinion, this kind of conduct from employers brings more disadvantages.
On the one hand, keeping interactions with
staff
in their leisure
time
results in detrimental impacts for individuals and
corporations
.
Firstly
, as employers can
contact
their
employees
with no restrictions, in order to avoid missing any crucial announcements,
staff
cannot turn off their
work
phones.
Consequently
,
employees
do not have ample
time
to enjoy personal life, which imbalances individuals’ personal and
work
life.
Besides
, once one manager is admissible to
contact
teammates with no boundaries, other team leaders who want
employees
to have additional workload will follow the same conducts.
Therefore
, there will be unhealthy
company
cultures cultivated in corporations.
On the other hand
, contacting
employees
benefits
corporations’
competitiveness. Since managers can
contact
staff
at any
time
,
employees
might
be required
to
work
when urgent situations occur. Meanwhile, once
employees
assure vital projects
be accomplished
efficiently
and
be finished
in advance,
companies
can be more productive and be more competitive among peer
corporations
.
In contrast
, if businesses
contact
staff
at any
time
, in a number of countries, this kind of
behaviour
will violate the
labour
law.
For instance
, in Canada, the
government
regulates that
employees
are not obligated to
work
in their spare time.
In conclusion
, despite keeping in control of
employees
without restrictions can benefit
companies
, there are more drawbacks for individuals and
corporations
.