Some countries reduce inner city traffic by increasing public transport Others impose a tax on people who drive in the city v.1
Some countries reduce inner city traffic by increasing public transport Others impose a tax on people who drive in the city v. 1
Few countries are taking measures to reduce traffic congestion by imposing a tax on people who drive in the city and encouraging people to use public transport instead. This essay will firstly discuss, how usage of more public transport will benefit the country as the biggest advantage. Secondly, how forcing people to pay a high tax for driving the car as a disadvantage.
Due to the increase in population, people are facing many adverse effects on the environment. One such thing is air pollution. When people use their own vehicle for commute, they are explicitly contributing to traffic, which in turn causes more air pollution. Instead, if people use public transport, traffic congestion can be controlled and making the environment more reliable place to live.
On the other hand, imposing the tax may benefit the government but not for the people. Places where public transport is not of high frequency, people are forced to use their own vehicle and for the local commute, people cannot rely on public transport all the time. People with low monthly wages will suffer a lot, due to the increase in the tax, as this will be an additional cost to them.
In conclusion, using more public transport is a really good plan to reduce traffic but the government should address those issues before imposing the tax, so people from different classes will get benefited.
Few countries are taking measures to
reduce
traffic
congestion by imposing a
tax
on
people
who drive in the city and encouraging
people
to
use
public
transport
instead
. This essay will
firstly
discuss, how usage of more
public
transport
will benefit the country as the biggest advantage.
Secondly
, how forcing
people
to pay a high
tax
for driving the car as a disadvantage.
Due to the increase in population,
people
are facing
many
adverse effects on the environment. One such thing is air pollution. When
people
use
their
own
vehicle for commute, they are
explicitly
contributing to
traffic
, which in turn causes more air pollution.
Instead
, if
people
use
public
transport
,
traffic
congestion can
be controlled
and making the environment more reliable place to
live
.
On the other hand
, imposing the
tax
may benefit the
government
but
not for the
people
. Places where
public
transport
is not of high frequency,
people
are forced
to
use
their
own
vehicle and for the local commute,
people
cannot rely on
public
transport
all the time.
People
with low monthly wages will suffer a lot, due to the increase in the
tax
, as this will be an additional cost to them.
In conclusion
, using more
public
transport
is a
really
good
plan to
reduce
traffic
but
the
government
should address those issues
before
imposing the
tax
,
so
people
from
different
classes will
get
benefited.
6Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
32Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes