Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some countries have introduced a law to limit working hours for employees. Why is this law introduced? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development?

Some countries have introduced a law to limit working hours for employees. Why is this law introduced? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? lk3b

It is true that the limitation of working hours for individuals was legislated by some countries. There are several reasons for this law, and in my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects. The law for humans limitation in terms of occupational hours was introduced because of medicine and education alike. First of all, this statute focused primarily on people's health as it is not only common issue, but also crucial option for humanity to attempt to keep healthy lifestyle. In other words, people are restricted to avoid health problems. Besides that, education is also benefited by this since it limits students too. The primary motive is to make youths be more attentive to their studies. To illustrate, if student worked a lot, he or she would not be capable of accomplishing projects or tasks, as a result. On the one hand, this development can be extremely positive. It provides psychological well-being of people as they would not work at the expence of their health since it is not allowed too. Apart from that, they can have recreation instead of stressful work, and spend much more time with their families and acquaintances. On the other hand, a rule for limitation of working hours can generate a great deal of heated debate, particularly, between governments and families with poorer socio-economic background. Meaning that, poor people's budgets are under-appreciated option, while individuals can make ends meet hardly. In conclusion, legislation in terms of working hours for individuals can have benefits, but not every option can be positive.

It is true that the limitation of working You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointflashjuncturetimedateoccasion
hours
 for individuals was legislated
 by This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 countries. There are several reasons for this law, and in my opinion, there are both This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:beneficial
positive
 and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 effects.

The law for humans limitation in terms of occupational You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointflashjuncturetimedateoccasion
hours
was introduced
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of medicine and education alike. This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".First
First of all
, this statute focused primarily
 on This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
's health as it is not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 common issue, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
 crucial option for humanity to attempt to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :retain
keep
 healthy lifestyle. In other words
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
are restricted
 to avoid health problems. Besides
 that, education is also
 benefited by this since it limits students too. The primary motive is to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 youths be more attentive to their studies. To illustrate, if student worked a lot, he or she would not be capable of accomplishing projects or tasks, as a result
.

On the one hand, this development can be extremely
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:beneficial
positive
. It provides psychological well-being of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 as they would not work at the Possible spelling mistake found.expenseex pence
expence
 of their health since it is not This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:admissible
allowed
 too. Apart from that, they can have recreation instead
 of stressful work, and spend much more time with their families and acquaintances. On the other hand
, a This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirement
rule
 for limitation of working You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointflashjuncturetimedateoccasion
hours
 can generate a great deal of heated debate, particularly
, between This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
governments
 and families with poorer Possible spelling mistake found.socioeconomic
socio-economic
 background. Meaning that, poor This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
's budgets are under-appreciated option, while individuals can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 ends This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :attain
meet
 hardly.

In conclusion
, legislation in terms of working You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointflashjuncturetimedateoccasion
hours
 for individuals can have benefits, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 not every option can be This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:beneficial
positive
. 