SOME CONSIDERED THAT PUT FUND FOR SPECIES WHICH FACING TO EXTINCTION DOESN'T WORTH, YET OTHER ONES THINK THAT IT IS CRUCIAL. IN MY OPINION, SPENDING MUCH MONEY ON EXTINCTION BREES BECAUSE OF THEIR BENEFIT IS NECESSARY.
THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT THE DRAWBACKS OF PROTECTING EVERY BREED WHICH ARE ENCOUNTERS OF EXTINCTION ARE MORE THAN NOT SAVING THEM. FIRST, THE SUFFICIENT EFFECT OF PREVENTING BIODIVERSITY FROM IMPAIRING, SOMEHOW WORTH THAN ANY AMOUNT OF MONEY. THESE COULD ALSO LEAD TO SAVE ECOSYSTEM. FOR INSTANCE, THREAT OF ILLNESS SUCH AS A TYPE OF FUNGUS INTO THE AIR OUT OF ELIMINATION OF A KIND OF BAT. HOWEVER, THIS WOULD HURT NOT ONLY THE ECOSYSTEM BUT EVEN THE MANKIND'S LIFE.
SECONDLY, ATTACKER SPECIES ARE THE SECOND REASON FOR PROTECT THEM. IF A CERTAIN BREED VANISHES FROM A SCOPE, THE OTHER THAT THEIR LIFE HAS BEEN IN DANGER BECAUSE OF THOSE WILL ATTACK TO THAT SPECIFIC ZONE AND DESTROYING OTHER TYPE OF ANIMALS. FOR INSTANCE, BY EXTINCTION OF A TYPE OF INSECT WHICH EXISTS IN THEM IS CRUCIAL FOR THE FARMLAND MAY LEAD TO THAT FARMERS FOR DESTROYING PESTS FOR CROPS CULTIVATION FORCED TO USE PESTICIDE. AS A RESULT, THIS CHEMICAL PESTICIDE WOULD BE AFFECTING ON THE HEALTH OF THE CROPS AND OTHER HUMANS WHO UTILIZE THEM.
IN CONCLUSION, IF PREVENTING THE EXTINCTION OF SPECIES HAS PAID OFF, THE RAPID DETERIORATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT WOULD DECREASE. AND ALSO THE DIRECT EFFECT THAT IT HAS ON HUMAN LIFE AND HABITAT WOULD MODIFY BY THIS MASSIVE CAMPAIGN AND MOVEMENT. 
 SOME
 CONSIDERED THAT PUT FUND FOR SPECIES WHICH FACING TO  
EXTINCTION
 DOESN'T WORTH,  
YET
  OTHER
 ONES  
THINK
 THAT IT IS CRUCIAL. IN MY OPINION, SPENDING MUCH MONEY ON  
EXTINCTION
  BREES
  BECAUSE
 OF THEIR BENEFIT IS NECESSARY.
THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT THE DRAWBACKS OF PROTECTING EVERY BREED WHICH ARE ENCOUNTERS OF  
EXTINCTION
 ARE MORE THAN NOT SAVING THEM.  
FIRST
, THE SUFFICIENT EFFECT OF PREVENTING BIODIVERSITY FROM IMPAIRING, SOMEHOW  
WORTH
 THAN ANY AMOUNT OF MONEY. THESE COULD  
ALSO
 LEAD TO SAVE ECOSYSTEM.  
FOR INSTANCE
, THREAT OF ILLNESS SUCH AS A TYPE OF FUNGUS INTO THE AIR OUT OF ELIMINATION OF A KIND OF BAT.  
HOWEVER
, THIS WOULD HURT NOT  
ONLY
 THE ECOSYSTEM  
BUT
 EVEN THE MANKIND'S LIFE. 
SECONDLY
, ATTACKER SPECIES ARE THE SECOND REASON FOR PROTECT THEM. IF A CERTAIN BREED VANISHES FROM A SCOPE, THE  
OTHER
 THAT THEIR LIFE HAS BEEN IN  
DANGER
  BECAUSE
 OF THOSE WILL ATTACK TO THAT SPECIFIC ZONE AND DESTROYING  
OTHER
 TYPE OF ANIMALS.  
FOR INSTANCE
, BY  
EXTINCTION
 OF A TYPE OF INSECT WHICH EXISTS IN THEM IS CRUCIAL FOR THE FARMLAND MAY LEAD TO THAT FARMERS FOR DESTROYING PESTS FOR CROPS CULTIVATION FORCED TO  
USE
 PESTICIDE.  
AS A RESULT
, THIS CHEMICAL PESTICIDE WOULD BE AFFECTING ON THE HEALTH OF THE CROPS AND  
OTHER
 HUMANS WHO UTILIZE THEM. 
IN CONCLUSION
, IF PREVENTING THE  
EXTINCTION
 OF SPECIES HAS PAID OFF, THE RAPID DETERIORATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT WOULD DECREASE. AND  
ALSO
 THE DIRECT EFFECT THAT IT HAS ON HUMAN LIFE AND HABITAT WOULD MODIFY BY THIS MASSIVE CAMPAIGN AND MOVEMENT.