Over the past decades, there is a contentious issues about the animal cruelty behind the manufacturing process of major consumer goods. While some commentators abominate the employment of animal-testing, it remains evident to the fact that the necessity might outweigh the culpability it ensues. The aim of this essay is set to review both viewpoints.
To begin with, the purpose of testing procedures applying on animals is often perceived as an impetus on assuring the quality of ultimate products. What this means is having a real application of experimental chemicals entailing medicines and perfume, scientists are capable to draw conclusion in accordance with the measurements, which in turn guarantee the safeness of the products prior to making contact with human skins upon public launch. Recent empirical research from the Pokemon Company ascertain that over 700 failed assessments on monkeys pave the way for their successful implementation of super soldier serum. Seen in this light, animal testing is likely to be an imperative to inventions, especially those derived from chemistry.
Although there is a case necessitating animal test, the impact of conducting such operation cannot be underestimated. In fact, the spate of confrontation against the ensuing products from customers has perplexed the public relationship sector of some laboratories. Extensive studies from the P& G company indicates that the demand of particular products, coupled with the break of animal test involvement, has witnessed a considerable decline of 50% from last year. Admittedly, the market share of products being tested by animals are encountering challenges from their animal-friendly counterparts, the integration of such evaluation, therefore, accompanies by a high tendency on hindering market expansion.
In conclusion, conducting animal tests has coincidently begot benefits on quality assurance and the possible hindrance on marketing, yet the gravity of reinforcing safety, however, by far outweigh the moral disagreement. It is predicted that factories will intensify the effort spent on precluding the evidence of animal test from being exposed to public.
Over the past decades, there is a contentious
issues
about the
animal
cruelty behind the manufacturing process of major consumer
goods
. While
some
commentators abominate the employment of animal-testing, it remains evident to the fact that the necessity might outweigh the culpability it ensues. The aim of this essay
is set
to review both viewpoints.
To
begin
with, the purpose of testing procedures applying on
animals
is
often
perceived as an impetus on assuring the quality of ultimate
products
. What this means is having a real application of experimental chemicals entailing medicines and perfume, scientists are capable to draw conclusion in accordance with the measurements, which in turn guarantee the safeness of the
products
prior to making contact with human skins upon public launch. Recent empirical research from the
Pokemon
Company
ascertain that over 700 failed assessments on monkeys pave the way for their successful implementation of super soldier serum.
Seen
in this light,
animal
testing is likely to be an imperative to inventions,
especially
those derived from chemistry.
Although there is a case necessitating
animal
test
, the impact of conducting such operation cannot
be underestimated
. In fact, the spate of confrontation against the ensuing
products
from customers has perplexed the public relationship sector of
some
laboratories. Extensive studies from the
P&
; G
company
indicates that the demand of particular
products
, coupled with the break of
animal
test
involvement, has witnessed a considerable decline of 50% from last year.
Admittedly
, the market share of
products
being
tested
by
animals
are encountering challenges from their animal-friendly counterparts, the integration of such evaluation,
therefore
, accompanies by a high tendency on hindering market expansion.
In conclusion
, conducting
animal
tests
has
coincidently
begot benefits on quality assurance and the possible hindrance on marketing,
yet
the gravity of reinforcing safety,
however
, by far outweigh the moral disagreement. It
is predicted
that factories will intensify the effort spent on precluding the evidence of
animal
test
from
being exposed
to public.