Some believe that the government should prevent crime, while others believe that everyone should have a responsibility to protect themselves from wrongdoing. There are rational arguments on both sides of this topic, which we will discuss in detail, and then my opinion on this matter.
Some believe that the government should prevent crime, while others believe that everyone should have a responsibility to protect themselves from wrongdoing. There are rational arguments on both sides of this topic, which we will discuss in detail, and then my opinion on this matter. GLEEQ
Some believe that the government should prevent crime, while others believe that everyone should have a responsibility to protect themselves from wrongdoing. There are rational arguments on both sides of this topic, which we will discuss in detail, and then my opinion on this matter.
On the one hand, some people believe that each of us should be concerned about our own safety, since government securities organizations cannot be present in all hotbeds of crime. For example, the police cannot prevent every incident, such as shoplifting, which can happen everywhere and all the time. Consequently, store owners are responsible for taking preventive measures such as installing alarms or cameras in their store. Plus, if customers take care of their belongings, there will be no theft while shopping. Thus, it is clear that everyone is responsible for their own safety. On the other hand, there is a limit to what a person can do on their own. In this respect, only governments can enforce strict laws to control crime rates. Strict laws will become a hindrance and will greatly reduce the crime rate. For example, Arab countries have harsh penalties such as lengthy imprisonment or even the death penalty for every offense. As a result, people are hesitant to break laws, and the crime rate is much lower than in other areas. Consequently, the state must accept responsibility and enforce strict rules that will deter people from committing crimes.
In conclusion, there are strong arguments on both sides of the controversy; however, I firmly believe that the responsibility to curb criminal activity lies with the government through the enactment of strict laws.
Some
believe
that the
government
should
prevent
crime
, while others
believe
that everyone should have a responsibility to protect themselves from wrongdoing. There are rational arguments on both sides of this topic, which we will discuss in detail, and then my opinion on this matter.
On the one hand,
some
people
believe
that each of us should
be concerned
about our
own
safety, since
government
securities organizations cannot be present in all hotbeds of
crime
.
For example
, the police cannot
prevent
every incident, such as shoplifting, which can happen everywhere and all the time.
Consequently
, store owners are responsible for taking preventive measures such as installing alarms or cameras in their store. Plus, if customers take care of their belongings, there will be no theft while shopping.
Thus
, it is
clear
that everyone is responsible for their
own
safety.
On the other hand
, there is a limit to what a person can do on their
own
. In this respect,
only
governments
can enforce
strict
laws
to control
crime
rates.
Strict
laws
will become a hindrance and will
greatly
reduce
the
crime
rate.
For example
, Arab countries have harsh penalties such as lengthy imprisonment or even the death penalty for every offense.
As a result
,
people
are hesitant to break
laws
, and the
crime
rate is much lower than in other areas.
Consequently
, the state
must
accept responsibility and enforce
strict
rules
that will deter
people
from committing crimes.
In conclusion
, there are strong arguments on both sides of the controversy;
however
, I
firmly
believe
that the responsibility to curb criminal activity lies with the
government
through the enactment of
strict
laws
.