Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some argue younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while others think this is a good idea. v.3

Some argue younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while others think this is a good idea. v. 3
Government jobs at key positions are very critical and require serious responsibilities. Decision making done through important positions creates a long-term impact on the growth of the country in different sectors. Many people believe that critical offices in government should only be awarded to more experienced bureaucrats, while others believe that one should benefit from the creative and thriving skills of the young generation. This essay will look at both sides before drawing a conclusion. One the one hand, many argue that influential positions in government should only be given to older and experienced candidates. They say that experience give them necessary skill set which is vital in their decision-making skills. For instance, in the case of militancy in the country, a General would be more effective in mitigating the situation as compared to a lieutenant who has recently graduated. Moreover, they believe that young people, due to lack of field experience are unable to manage large teams and are unaware of government operations, procedures and regulations. Their induction in key positions can have catastrophic effects on the growth of the country. However, there are several plausible counters in favour of this argument. Young generation brings creativity and innovation in their work, which is vital for prosperity in the modern era. Their enthusiasm and dedication are nonpareil with older people. For instance, young government health workers successfully raised the awareness of polio vaccines in the country. Their efforts are evident from the charts where the number of polio cases registered every quarter is decreasing. Often government jobs require rigorous screening based on different criteria and if the youth is successful in passing out those that there is no harm in awarding important government jobs to young aspirants. Although the above arguments provide firm evidence for both sides of the argument, it is felt that healthiest approach in offering key government jobs is to ensure they follow rigorous training programs.   Thus, a person's age should not be a discriminating factor in awarding government jobs.
Government
jobs
at key
positions
are
very
critical and require serious responsibilities.
Decision making
done through
important
positions
creates a long-term impact on the growth of the country in
different
sectors.
Many
people
believe that critical offices in
government
should
only
be awarded
to more experienced bureaucrats, while others believe that one should benefit from the creative and thriving
skills
of the
young
generation. This essay will look at both sides
before
drawing a conclusion.

One
the one hand,
many
argue that influential
positions
in
government
should
only
be
given
to older and experienced candidates. They say that experience give them necessary
skill
set which is vital in their decision-making
skills
.
For instance
, in the case of militancy in the country, a General would be more effective in mitigating the situation as compared to a lieutenant who has recently graduated.
Moreover
, they believe that
young
people
, due to lack of field experience are unable to manage large teams and are unaware of
government
operations, procedures and regulations. Their induction in key
positions
can have catastrophic effects on the growth of the country.

However
, there are several plausible counters in
favour
of this argument.
Young
generation brings creativity and innovation in their work, which is vital for prosperity in the modern era. Their enthusiasm and dedication are nonpareil with older
people
.
For instance
,
young
government
health workers
successfully
raised the awareness of polio vaccines in the country. Their efforts are evident from the charts where the number of polio cases registered every quarter is decreasing.
Often
government
jobs
require rigorous screening based on
different
criteria and if the youth is successful in passing out those that there is no harm in awarding
important
government
jobs
to
young
aspirants.

Although the above arguments provide firm evidence for both sides of the argument, it
is felt
that healthiest approach in offering key
government
jobs
is to ensure they follow rigorous training programs.
 
Thus
, a person's age should not be a discriminating factor in awarding
government
jobs
.
5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
23Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes
Language is the blood of the soul into which thoughts run and out of which they grow.
Oliver Wendell Holmes

IELTS essay Some argue younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while others think this is a good idea. v. 3

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
334 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts