Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some are in favour of Recycling, while others are not. Discuss both view and give your opinion

Some are in favour of Recycling, while others are not. Discuss both view and give your opinion PRo1E
Human life style has changed drastically over a period of time. While majority of us believe that this is the demand of the time where we must agGressively focus on the recycling while others are still in favour that we can live with this. Below, I am going to discuss both the view, where my opinion is that its high time to focus on the recycling. There are multiple benefits if we can establish and enforce the recyCling by law. First of all, good environment and relief from the major worrying global warming. If we make a habit of using paper and clothes instead the plastic then most of our problems would be resolved. For example, we can substanTially reduce the plastic usage and through that we can keep our river and the ocean clean and can save millions of live. Secondly, We must focus on resale of the goods which helps us to reduce the demand for further production. On the other hand, some people are in support that we have enough natural resources and one should not worry about the recycling. Their argument is that when we have sufficient resources available then we must use, additionally they support their view with the fact that paper can not replace plastic, also keeping the plastic bags safe and reusing them is not human friendly. To summArize, we are responsible for what we are doing today and we should keep in mind that this is what we are going to give to our coming generations. It is in everyone's interest that the recycling should be enforced to have the future secured for all, at the same time we can have good ways to implement the same so that the current society is not impacted with that.
Human life style has
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changed
drastically
over a period of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
. While
It seems that an article is missing.
majority of
us believe that this is the demand of the
It is better to use 'time' with the time-relative pronoun 'when': "time when". (Alternatively, use 'in/on which')
time where
we
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
Possible spelling mistake found.
agGressively
focus on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
while others are
still
in
Possible spelling mistake. 'favour' is British English.
favour
that we can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
with this. Below, I am going to discuss both the view, where my opinion is that its high
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
to focus on the recycling.

There are multiple benefits if we can establish and enforce the
Possible spelling mistake found.
recyCling
by law.
This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
environment and relief from the major worrying global warming. If we
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
a habit of using paper and clothes
instead
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
then most of our problems would
be resolved
.
For example
, we can
Possible spelling mistake found.
substanTially
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
usage and through that we can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
our river and the ocean clean and can save millions of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
.
Secondly
, We
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
focus on resale of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
us to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the demand for
further
production.

On the other hand
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
are in support that we have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
natural resources and one should not worry about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
. Their argument is that when we have sufficient resources available then we
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
,
additionally
they support their view with the fact that paper can not replace
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
,
also
keeping the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
bags safe and reusing them is not human friendly.

To
Possible spelling mistake found.
summArize
, we are responsible for what we are doing
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
today and
we should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
in mind that this is what we are going to give to our coming generations. It is in everyone's interest that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
should
be enforced
to have the future secured for all, at the same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
we can have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
ways to implement the same
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
society is not impacted with that.

IELTS essay Some are in favour of Recycling, while others are not. Discuss both view and give your opinion

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
295 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Some are in favour of Recycling, while others are not. Discuss both view and give your opinion