Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of international organisations rather than each national government . Agree or disagree?

Some argue that global organisations and corporations are responsible for environment-solving problems, instead of the government of each country. From my perspective, I totally disagree this statement. On the one hand, it is true that having international organisations specializing in handling the environmental issues is beneficial to some countries. Because there are some developing nations don’t have abilities and sources to address this problem. Furthermore, some countries have to face a host of other issues such as starvation, flu pandemic, flooding, . . . . so they can’t clear up every matter. These are reasons why some nations really need international support, especially from developed countries, they can join hand and handle all issues together. On the other hand, I believe that with only help from transnational organisations can’t address environmental problems properly, we also need the effort of the national government. Firly, although the environmental issues in different countries can share a lot similarities, but actually each nations’ problems drive from unsimilar causes and they need different approaches and solutions. For example, the USA is facing desertification caused by deforestation and over-exploitation, while that in China and Beijing is the result of accelerated urbanization. So the USA will have to cope with this problem with a solution which is different with that of China and Beijing. In conclusion, despite the advantages of having international organisations in dealing with problems related to the environment, I think the government’s role still the best.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
 argue that global organisations and corporations are responsible for environment-solving You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
, instead
 of the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 of each You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrusticbucolichomeyagrarianprovincial
country
. From my perspective, I totally
 disagree this statement.

On the one hand, it is true that having international organisations specializing in handling the environmental You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaffairpointquestionargumentcontroversytopic
issues
 is beneficial to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
Because
 there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 developing nations don’t have abilities and sources to address this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
. Furthermore
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 face a host of other You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaffairpointquestionargumentcontroversytopic
issues
 such as starvation, flu pandemic, flooding, . . . . This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 they can’t This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 up every matter. These are reasons why This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 nations really
 need international support, especially
 from developed You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
, they can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :consolidatefuse
join
 hand and handle all You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaffairpointquestionargumentcontroversytopic
issues
 together.

On the other hand
, I believe that with This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
 from transnational organisations can’t address environmental You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
properly
, we also
 need the effort of the national This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
. Firly
, although the environmental You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaffairpointquestionargumentcontroversytopic
issues
 in This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 can share a lot similarities, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 actually each nations’ You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
 drive from unsimilar causes and they need This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 approaches and solutions. For example
, the USA is facing desertification caused by deforestation and over-exploitation, while that in China and Beijing is the result of accelerated urbanization. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
 the USA will This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 cope with this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
 with a solution which is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 with that of China and Beijing.

In conclusion
, despite the advantages of having international organisations in dealing with You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
 related to the environment, I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
’s role still
 the best. 