The act of smacking children has become increasingly popular among the general populace. More people are of the opinion that physical punishment is the most effective way of controlling a child's deportment. This essay will argue that although corporal punishment can have the desired effect in training a child, it need not be the absolute form of discipline.
On the one hand, some parents have always been in support of administering a spanking as a means of educating children. They believe that children are more likely to heed to corrections when spanked. This, according to the parents, will discourage them from repeating the bad behaviour for which they are punished. For instance, parents might smack toddlers on the back of the hand to stop them from repeatedly spilling the liquids on the floorboards. Hence, the aforementioned reasons are why few parents employ punitive measures as the best mode of training their wards.
On the other hand, despite the seemingly positive impacts associated with beating children, the idea that it is the best form of instilling discipline is completely preposterous. Hitting children can be detrimental to their mental and physical well being. Also, it directly affects their brain and could cause behavioural issues in later life. For example, studies have shown that children who have been exposed to violence in childhood are 70 percent more predisposed to becoming rebellious in their teenage years. Overall, the idea that striking children is the ultimate mode of enforcing discipline is ill-informed and could potentially lead to a far worse outcome in the future.
In summary, this essay argued that using spanking as a means of punishing children is undoubtedly not the best method of teaching. In my opinion, it is entirely unacceptable to strike children in a bid to shape their personalities.
The act of smacking
children
has become
increasingly
popular among the general populace. More
people
are of the opinion that physical punishment is the most effective way of controlling a child's deportment. This essay will argue that although corporal punishment can have the desired effect in training a child, it need not be the absolute form of discipline.
On the one hand,
some
parents
have always been in support of administering a spanking as a means of educating
children
. They believe that
children
are more likely to heed to corrections when spanked. This, according to the
parents
, will discourage them from repeating the
bad
behaviour
for which they
are punished
.
For instance
,
parents
might smack toddlers on the back of the hand to
stop
them from
repeatedly
spilling the liquids on the floorboards.
Hence
, the aforementioned reasons are why few
parents
employ punitive measures as the best mode of training their wards.
On the other hand
, despite the
seemingly
positive
impacts associated with beating
children
, the
idea
that it is the best form of instilling discipline is completely preposterous. Hitting
children
can be detrimental to their mental and physical
well being
.
Also
, it
directly
affects their brain and could cause
behavioural
issues in later life.
For example
, studies have shown that
children
who have
been exposed
to violence in childhood are 70 percent more predisposed to becoming rebellious in their teenage years.
Overall
, the
idea
that striking
children
is the ultimate mode of enforcing discipline is ill-informed and could
potentially
lead to a far worse outcome in the future.
In summary, this essay argued that using spanking as a means of punishing
children
is
undoubtedly
not the best method of teaching. In my opinion, it is
entirely
unacceptable to strike
children
in a bid to shape their personalities.