High levels of sugar are added to the consumed foods and drinks by food business corporations, this is causing many health problems to citizens and residents all over the globe. This issue should be taken under serious consideration by the public in hopes to find a reliable solution to alleviate health risks caused by high sugar intakes. However, not any solution can be taken into account without considering its effects on people. This essay completely disagrees with those who think increasing the price on sugary products will solve this problem. Manipulating people for a cause had never worked, and there are better ways to make people eat less sugar.
If enforcing laws on the public for their greater goods is at least half as effective it claims to be in making people quit toxic behaviour then perhaps in many developing countries like India where there are many strict laws and fines against smoking in public places, it is to be expected that a lower number of people smoke in regular basis in Indian than in other countries, however, that's not the case, a new study in Karela University of medicine proved that about 85 percent of indian residence particularly adults and adolescents are addicted to nicotine. Furthermore, anecdotal evidence in many longitudinal studies indicate that enforcing unfair laws on people to maneuver them into a certain direction is usually met with a backlash, if we try to charge people extra for something for their own benefits, this will infuriate alot of individuals and patronise other, as if the government is treating them as unequipped to make their own decisions, in the most basic aspect of their lives. That is obviously an unethical approach to solve our problem.
Not only people won't respond positively to this method of alleviating sugary products from the market. But this solution is also an unsuitable one because making a particular type of food expensive, does not automatically make the other types of food less expensive. One of the key problems people face in shifting to healthier options is availability. where there are many ubiquitous fast food restaurants on every other street, on the other hand, there are fewer health conscious restaurants for double the price range. They are only pricey because they are considered rare, which causes less competition and as a result this allows their owners to increase the price. I believe truly to resolve this issue by taking some initiative such as, restaurants with nutritious food should be encouraged by the governments and banks to open up and be restricted to a lower price range to make it more available to the customers.
In conclusion, deciding what's best for the population is tricky. We need to opt for a solution that balances ethics, people’s freedom and people's health. 
High levels of sugar are  
added
 to the consumed  
foods
 and drinks by  
food
 business corporations, this is causing  
many
  health
 problems to citizens and residents all over the globe. This issue should  
be taken
 under serious consideration by the public in hopes to find a reliable  
solution
 to alleviate  
health
  risks
 caused by high sugar intakes.  
However
, not any  
solution
 can  
be taken
 into account without considering its effects on  
people
. This essay completely disagrees with those who  
think
 increasing the  
price
 on sugary products will solve this problem. Manipulating  
people
 for a cause had never worked, and there are better ways to  
make
  people
 eat less sugar.
If enforcing laws on the public for their greater  
goods
 is at least half as effective it claims to be in making  
people
 quit toxic  
behaviour
 then perhaps in  
many
  developing countries
 like India where there are  
many
 strict laws and fines against smoking in public places, it is to be  
expected
 that a lower number of  
people
 smoke in regular basis in Indian than in  
other
 countries,  
however
, that's not the case, a new study in  
Karela
 University of medicine proved that about 85 percent of  
indian
 residence  
particularly
 adults and adolescents  
are addicted
 to nicotine.  
Furthermore
, anecdotal evidence in  
many
 longitudinal studies indicate that enforcing unfair laws on  
people
 to maneuver them into a certain direction is  
usually
 met with a backlash, if we try to charge  
people
 extra for something for their  
own
 benefits, this will infuriate  
alot
 of individuals and  
patronise
  other
, as if the  
government
 is treating them as unequipped to  
make
 their  
own
 decisions, in the most basic aspect of their  
lives
.  
That is
  obviously
 an unethical approach to solve our problem.
Not  
only
  people
 won't respond  
positively
 to this method of alleviating sugary products from the market.  
But
 this  
solution
 is  
also
 an unsuitable one  
because
 making a particular type of  
food
 expensive, does not  
automatically
  make
 the  
other
 types of  
food
 less expensive. One of the key problems  
people
 face in shifting to healthier options is availability.  
where
 there are  
many
 ubiquitous  
fast
  food
 restaurants on every  
other
 street, on the  
other
 hand, there are fewer  
health
 conscious restaurants for double the  
price
 range. They are  
only
 pricey  
because
 they  
are considered
 rare, which causes less competition and  
as a result
 this  
allows
 their owners to increase the  
price
. I believe  
truly
 to resolve this issue by taking  
some
 initiative such as, restaurants with nutritious  
food
 should  
be encouraged
 by the  
governments
 and banks to open up and  
be restricted
 to a lower  
price
 range to  
make
 it more available to the customers. 
In conclusion
, deciding what's best for the population is tricky. We need to opt for a  
solution
 that balances ethics,  
people’s
 freedom and  
people
's  
health
.