Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

should international funds go for people or not, describe it.

should international funds go for people or not, describe it. gY6b3
The reading states that the world's jungles are facing forces that destroy them and as a result, a lot of industries will be in a dangerous situation. It mentions that international fund is an effective way to save forests and provides three reasons for this claim. However, the professor opposes this idea and refutes each of the points made in the reading. First, the passage mentions that agriculture is the most prominent field that should receive a fund in order to preserve their lands from big companies. The professor disagrees with this argument and explains that agriculture is one of the chief forces that damage ecosystems and nature. While population increases farmers use vast lands to plant food and vegetable for their consumption. Thus, they use a huge amount of pesticides that cause water and soil pollution. Therefore, giving international funds to agriculture is a way to help farmers exploit soil and forests. Second, the passage argues that if this fund goes for people who live in forests, it will be financial help for their living and education so, they will not tend to cut trees and use natural resources for their needs. However, the professor opposes this idea by explaining that paying the money for the owners of forests and lands is not the solution. He thinks that this money will go for the government who is the owner of forests and there is no guaranty that government will spend this money for saving the jungles. Thus, this cannot be a trustable solution to help people who live in forests in order to save jungles. Third, the reading claims that international funds should go for people and governments, so they can use this money to improve the diversity of plants and animals. The professor refuses this idea and argues that if people get the money they will use it for planting commercial trees and then will try to use the wood for their benefits. Therefore, the professor believes that this will not be an option to help the environmental development and natural relief.
The reading states that the world's jungles are facing forces that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroy
them and
as a result
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
industries will be in a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
dangerous
situation. It mentions that international
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fund
is an effective way to save
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forests
and provides three reasons for this claim.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
opposes this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
and refutes each of the points made in the reading.

First
, the passage mentions that agriculture is the most prominent field that should receive a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fund
in order to preserve their lands from
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
disagrees with this argument and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explains
that agriculture is one of the chief forces that damage ecosystems and nature. While population increases farmers
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
vast lands to plant food and vegetable for their consumption.
Thus
, they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
a huge amount of pesticides that cause water and soil pollution.
Therefore
, giving international funds to agriculture is a way to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
help
farmers exploit soil and forests.

Second, the passage argues that if this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fund
goes for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forests
, it will be financial
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
help
for their living and education
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
, they will not tend to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
cut
trees and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
natural resources for their needs.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
opposes this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
by explaining that paying the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
for the owners of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forests
and lands is not the solution. He
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thinks
that this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
will go for the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
who is the owner of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forests
and there is no guaranty that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
will spend this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
for saving the jungles.
Thus
, this cannot be a trustable solution to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
help
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forests
in order to save jungles.

Third, the reading claims that international funds should go for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
they can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improve
the diversity of plants and animals. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
refuses this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
and argues that if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
they will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
it for planting commercial trees and then will try to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
the wood for their benefits.
Therefore
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
believes that this will not be an option to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
help
the environmental development and natural relief.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay should international funds go for people or not, describe it.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
344 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts