Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. v.2

Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. v. 2
The issue of whether ancient buildings are relics of the past and should be preserved or superseded by modern buildings whose apperance might open a new horizon for the development of a nation has been a highly debated topic recently. While there is a strong case for the latter viewpoint, I am more inclined to the latter due to its validity. On the one hand, there are various reasons why many people argue that these old houses need to be knocked down and alternated. Firstly, in case of derelict ones, such experience of living in these shelters could be quite a nightmare to quite a few people. For instance, citizens of Hoi An are suffering frome a low-quality life in ancient streets. It is a common-scene to some that three to four households have only one toilet system with their walls painting layers bound to peel off and their ceilings sagging owing to weathering. Moreover, opponents have their points in the belief that these old, unsafe and dirty buildings should be demolished to give way to skyscapers to accommodate an ever-increasing number of people flocking to the city in hope for a better life. In this case, modern complex structures is an alternative approach to deal with the explosion of population in rural areas. On the other hand, I would advocate with those who contend that the heritage sites are corrolated to the reservoir of the glorious past of a nation. Philosophically speaking, like a person who clings to the past to reflect, views the present to enjoy and contemplates the future, a city itself entails an inextricable link of these three time axes to revise, thrive and fly. Another rationale would be that these historical monuments serve as amental panacea for hurry-sickness city dwellers and embodiment, symbolic of the unique architecture. Hardly can modern day artist recreate such beauties as that by famous ancestral architects of yesterdays who utilized the past materials and for that reason, some streets adorned with second-to-none buildings are ideal destination for the visitors worldwide to save themselves in the sense of serence old days. To those who are obsessed with the bustle and hustle of metropolitian life, these tiny ancient houses resemble oases to ease their stress. In conclusion, while it stands undeniable that each ideas has its own reasoning, from my perspective, the presence of ancient buildings is essential to the survival of any city for their originality and mesmeriziable destinations of travel lovers.
The issue of whether
ancient
buildings
are relics of the
past
and should
be preserved
or superseded by modern
buildings
whose
apperance
might open a new horizon for the development of a nation has been a
highly
debated topic recently. While there is a strong case for the latter viewpoint, I am more inclined to the latter due to its validity.

On the one hand, there are various reasons why
many
people
argue that these
old
houses
need to
be knocked
down and alternated.
Firstly
, in case of derelict ones, such experience of living in these shelters could be quite a nightmare to quite a few
people
.
For instance
, citizens of
Hoi
An are
suffering
frome
a low-quality life in
ancient
streets. It is a common-scene to
some
that three to four households have
only
one toilet system with their walls painting layers bound to peel off and their ceilings sagging owing to weathering.
Moreover
, opponents have their points in the belief that these
old
, unsafe and dirty
buildings
should
be demolished
to give way to
skyscapers
to accommodate an ever-increasing number of
people
flocking to the city in hope for a better life.
In this case
, modern complex structures is an alternative approach to deal with the explosion of population in rural areas.

On the other hand
, I would advocate with those
who
contend that the heritage sites are
corrolated
to the reservoir of the glorious
past
of a nation.
Philosophically
speaking, like a person
who
clings to the
past
to reflect, views the present to enjoy and contemplates the future, a city itself entails an inextricable link of these three time axes to revise, thrive and
fly
. Another rationale would be that these historical monuments serve as
amental
panacea for hurry-sickness city dwellers and embodiment, symbolic of the unique architecture. Hardly can modern day artist recreate such beauties as that by
famous
ancestral architects of yesterdays
who
utilized the
past
materials and for that reason,
some
streets adorned with second-to-none
buildings
are ideal destination for the visitors worldwide to save themselves in the sense of
serence
old
days. To those
who
are obsessed
with the bustle and hustle of
metropolitian
life, these tiny
ancient
houses
resemble oases to
ease
their
stress
.

In conclusion
, while it stands undeniable that each
ideas
has its
own
reasoning, from my perspective, the presence of
ancient
buildings
is essential to the survival of any city for their originality and
mesmeriziable
destinations of travel lovers.
6Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
17Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
11Mistakes

IELTS essay Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. v. 2

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
411 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts