Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Should a city protect historical heritage sites, even at the expense of its development? v.1

Should a city protect historical heritage sites, even at the expense of its development? v. 1
Nowadays preserving historical heritage sites is a significant purpose which some cities achieve at the expense of their development. This essay will examine the advantages and disadvantages of protecting the historical legacy at the cost of a city’s expansion and provide a logical conclusion. The two main advantages of saving ancient buildings and locations are boost in the city’s economy and conservation of nation’s spiritual heritage. Firstly, as far as economy concerned, it is improved by tourism industry that provides job opportunities and tourists, who spend money in a city. The better condition sites have, the more visitors they have. For instance, about 6 million people attend the Colosseum annually and the number of them is constantly growing, making the Colosseum one of the most visited attractions in the world. Secondly, heritage sites represent the past history and culture of a city having a connection with essential events that occurred in the area such as religious, social and political events. In addition, historical buildings form together the architectural heritage of an area. However, protecting historical legacy at the expense of the city’s development has disadvantages. The main drawback is that history is not as significant as progress. Some experts support the view that people should not live in the past, instead, they should seek to the future. Moreover, it is widely believed that all spheres should be developed. Another negative aspect is that ancient buildings are sometimes impractical and do not have their own purpose. Supporters of the idea claim that by replacing these buildings, there will be more space for housing, which is important due to the problem of overcrowding. However, appropriate steps taken by the government can eliminate these disadvantages. In conclusion, although preserving historical heritage sites at the expense of the city’s development has certain drawbacks like impracticality of the sites and importance of progress, it has a positive impact on the city’s economy and saves nation’s spiritual heritage. I firmly believe that the benefits outweigh the disadvantages.
Nowadays preserving
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
historical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
heritage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sites
is a significant purpose which
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
achieve at the expense of their development. This essay will examine the advantages and disadvantages of protecting the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
historical
legacy at the cost of a city’s expansion and provide a logical conclusion.

The two main advantages of saving ancient
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
and locations are boost in the city’s economy and conservation of nation’s spiritual
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
heritage
.
Firstly
, as far as economy concerned, it is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improved
by tourism industry that provides job opportunities and tourists, who spend money in a city. The better condition
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sites
have, the more visitors they have.
For instance
, about 6 million
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
attend the Colosseum
annually
and the number of them is
constantly
growing, making the Colosseum one of the most visited attractions in the world.
Secondly
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
heritage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sites
represent the past history and culture of a city having a connection with essential
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
events
that occurred in the area such as religious, social and political
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
events
.
In addition
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
historical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
form together the architectural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
heritage
of an area.

However
, protecting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
historical
legacy at the expense of the city’s development has disadvantages. The main drawback is that history is not as significant as progress.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
experts support the view that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
should not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
in the past,
instead
, they should seek to the future.
Moreover
, it is
widely
believed that all spheres should
be developed
. Another
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
aspect is that ancient
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
impractical and do not have their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
purpose. Supporters of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
claim that by replacing these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
, there will be more space for housing, which is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
due to the problem of overcrowding.

However
, appropriate steps taken by the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
can eliminate these disadvantages.

In conclusion
, although preserving
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
historical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
heritage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sites
at the expense of the city’s development has certain drawbacks like impracticality of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sites
and importance of progress, it has a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
impact on the city’s economy and saves nation’s spiritual
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
heritage
. I
firmly
believe that the benefits outweigh the disadvantages.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
21Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes

IELTS essay Should a city protect historical heritage sites, even at the expense of its development? v. 1

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
331 words
6
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts