In the recent climate, giving general access to data and publishing essential information in various fields such as experimental and economic issues have their own merits and demerits. Some persons claim that having access to these types of information is completely necessary and everyone should allow to use them, while others, myself included, believe some of these results are top secret and due to colossal money investments to achieve them, it is better not to pass in general. The proponents of sharing data and information freely and without any permission, debate that the aims of most researches which are carrying out by various institutes are to improve the way of people's lives and their environment. Consequently, every person has to be allowed to use these data. An example could be medical breakthroughs in healing severe diseases. Sharing this type of research paper would bring about great benefits to all persons and countries. In stark contrast, the criticizers of the former view argue that behind all the projects, no matter scientific, economic, or even academic, is a huge investment in terms of time, capital, plus human efforts. Owing to this fact is not fair to give the free and public access to these results. Take as a case in point, a scientist who devoted their whole personal life to devise a new contraption. To support these inventors, anyone who wants this device should pay and buy the special patent. Not only are the patents vital, but also this copyright is a way to offset all the hard works of scientists. From what has been discussed and in order to draw the conclusion, it is essential to keep some data instead of sharing them freely. This is a way to support persons and institutes to continue their researches.
In the recent climate, giving general access to
data
and publishing essential information in various fields such as experimental and economic issues have their
own
merits and demerits.
Some
persons
claim that having access to these types of information is completely necessary and everyone should
allow
to
use
them, while others, myself included, believe
some
of these results are top secret and due to colossal money investments to achieve them, it is better not to pass
in general
. The proponents of sharing
data
and information
freely
and without any permission, debate that the aims of most researches which are carrying out by various institutes are to
improve
the way of
people
's
lives
and their environment.
Consequently
, every
person
has to
be
allowed
to
use
these
data
. An example could be medical breakthroughs in healing severe diseases. Sharing this type of research paper would bring about great benefits to all
persons
and countries. In stark contrast, the criticizers of the former view argue that behind all the projects, no matter scientific, economic, or even academic, is a huge investment in terms of time, capital, plus human efforts. Owing to this fact is not
fair
to give the free and public access to these results. Take as a case in point, a scientist who devoted their whole personal life to devise a new contraption. To support these inventors, anyone who wants this device should pay and
buy
the special patent. Not
only
are the patents vital,
but
also
this copyright is a way to offset all the
hard
works of scientists. From what has
been discussed
and in order to draw the conclusion, it is essential to
keep
some
data
instead
of sharing them
freely
. This is a way to support
persons
and institutes to continue their researches.