Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by tiny numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion v.4

Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by tiny numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. 4
Some languages are facing to extinction because of they are spoken by plenty little communities. To save these languages is an important duty of governments for some people, however, other belief is a complete waste of money to promote saving limiting spoken languages. In my opinion, I believe that every language should be live and every community saves their language heritage, even if that is cost of more public money. Today's world is universal and everybody can communicate universal language easily. Sometimes, local community keeps away from their lands by the time, so they have forgotten their mother tongue. Moreover, youngest have never learnt these languages in order to live and give it their children. However, there are some prevention to live these languages, especially the governments should be recovered this situation regardless how much cost it. The living languages belong to all humanity, not only local people. I strongly believe that, it is more important than money to save endangered languages and every government should be doing something for speaking these languages forever. On the other hand, that is not worth so much money to save these limited language in another argument. These people think that, the government should take the money more important things rather than cultural importance. I think, the most remarkable thing is cultural heritage which belongs to all humanity. For instance, in my country, a fascinating women scientist Muzaffer İlmiye Çığ worked an old language and their culture. We have learned her researches not only an old language, but also some mystery of their ages. In conclusion, the limited spoken language should be live and save both in their community and the government without thinking about cost. If these cultural ancestry belongs humanity, every person should be save language respectively.
Some
languages
are facing to extinction
because of they
are spoken
by
plenty
little
communities
. To
save
these
languages
is an
important
duty of
governments
for
some
people
,
however
, other belief is a complete waste of
money
to promote saving limiting spoken
languages
. In my opinion, I believe that every
language
should be
live
and every
community
saves
their
language
heritage, even if that
is cost
of more public money.

Today
's world is universal and everybody can communicate universal
language
easily
.
Sometimes
, local
community
keeps
away from their lands by the time,
so
they have forgotten their mother tongue.
Moreover
, youngest have never
learnt
these
languages
in order to
live
and give it their children.
However
, there are
some
prevention to
live
these
languages
,
especially
the
governments
should
be recovered
this situation regardless how much cost it. The living
languages
belong to all humanity, not
only
local
people
. I
strongly
believe that, it is more
important
than
money
to
save
endangered
languages
and every
government
should be doing something for speaking these
languages
forever.

On the other hand
,
that is
not worth
so
much
money
to
save
these limited
language
in another argument. These
people
think
that, the
government
should take the
money
more
important
things
rather
than cultural importance. I
think
, the most remarkable thing is cultural heritage which belongs to all humanity.
For instance
, in my country, a fascinating women scientist
Muzaffer
İlmiye
Çığ
worked an o
ld
language
and their culture. We have learned her researches not o
nly
an o
ld
language
, b
ut
a
lso
s
ome
mystery of their ages.

I
n conclusion,
the limited spoken
language
should be l
ive
and
save
both in their
community
and the g
overnment
without thinking about cost. If these cultural ancestry belongs humanity, every person should be
save
language
respectively
.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes
The limits of my language mean the limits of my world.
Ludwig Wittgenstein

IELTS essay Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by tiny numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. 4

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
295 words
8
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts