Today, we are living in a global community. Therefore, to address the needs of this globalization, people sometimes raise voice for the implementation of a globalized speaking communication. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of the this popular belief by using the examples of Oxford University research and Times Magazine survey to demonstrate the points and support the claims.
On the one hand, a single global language has a couple of benefits. Firstly, it is easier to understand those cultures, which we are not aware of because of their complex foreign language. Secondly, it is convenient for the people to address each other in case of any need. For example, Oxford University in 2016 researched about the future outputs of a globalized speaking system and find out that it will burst all the psychological barriers of superiority on the basis of addressed communication. So from this example, it is clear that a single language of the globe is the need of the day.
On the other hand, few problems will also arise if the unified mother tongue idea gets successful. As, most of the people are deeply influenced by their cultural roots and they don’t want to lose their ancestors’ mother tongue. Additionally, the mother tongue unification will affect the intelligence levels of the new generation as the bilinguals are supposed to be more intellectual. Similarly, a survey of Times Magazine will address the same issue and find out that 60% people agree that the bilingual people are more intelligent as compared to the monolinguals. So from this example, it is clear that it’s difficult to implement a unified speaking system because people are not willing for this change.
To conclude, the monolingual approach for the globe is a beneficial approach, but it’s difficult for the people to leave their cultural influences which are attached to that language. In the future, it’s better if the world will also honour the importance of cultural languages instead of uniting the world on a single speaking platform.
Today
, we are living in a global community.
Therefore
, to address the needs of this globalization,
people
sometimes
raise voice for the implementation of a globalized speaking communication. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of
the this
popular belief by using the
examples
of Oxford University research and Times Magazine survey to demonstrate the points and support the claims.
On the one hand, a single global
language
has a couple of benefits.
Firstly
, it is easier to understand those cultures, which we are not aware of
because
of their complex foreign
language
.
Secondly
, it is convenient for the
people
to address each other in case of any need. For
example
, Oxford University in 2016 researched about the future outputs of a globalized speaking system and find out that it will
burst
all the psychological barriers of superiority on the basis of addressed communication.
So
from this
example
, it is
clear
that a single
language
of the globe is the need of the day.
On the other hand
, few problems will
also
arise if the unified mother tongue
idea
gets
successful. As, most of the
people
are
deeply
influenced by their cultural
roots and
they don’t want to lose their ancestors’ mother tongue.
Additionally
, the mother tongue unification will affect the intelligence levels of the new generation as the bilinguals
are supposed
to be more intellectual.
Similarly
, a survey of Times Magazine will address the same issue and find out that 60%
people
agree
that the bilingual
people
are more intelligent as compared to the monolinguals.
So
from this
example
, it is
clear
that it’s difficult to implement a unified speaking system
because
people
are not willing for this
change
.
To conclude
, the monolingual approach for the globe is a beneficial approach,
but
it’s difficult for the
people
to
leave
their cultural influences which
are attached
to that
language
. In the future, it’s better if the world will
also
honour
the importance of cultural
languages
instead
of uniting the world on a single speaking platform.