Recent decades have witnessed an increase in the imported labour proportions, raising many questions of workers’ safety. Although the proposal that skilled workers should stay in their own developing country sounds reasonable, i think that developed countries need them more.
Workers with professional competence could gain many benefits when moving to affluent countries. First, Expatriates in developed countries means better career prospects. This means that they could easily find a job with high remuneration and many benefits in kind, improving their living standards. Second, Working in developed nations is invariably associated with a liberty from the rigid laws and harsh social norms from the home country. For example, many homosexual individuals in Russia have a propensity to work in other European countries because sodomy means capital punishment.
Third-world countries could benefit from allowing their skilled workers to work in other prosperous nations. First, Many skilled labourers from poor countries would be conducive to increase in the national incomes of the host country. This could be implied that this rich country would conduct some outsourcing investments in the poor country such as the establishment of educational institutions with professional training courses or medical institutions with skilled medical personnel, which promote the locals’ living standards. In addition, Sending the workers with high competence could act as an incentive for an improvement in the diplomatic relationship between the poor and the affluent countries. For instance, As many skillful Vietnamese have promoted the working productivity in the United States, Vietnam now has been the top priority when American conducts financial assistance programmes.
In conclusion, I believe that third-world countries should send their professional workers to some developed countries for some advantages in terms of living standard improvement and economic development.
Recent decades have witnessed an increase in the imported
labour
proportions, raising
many
questions of
workers’
safety. Although the proposal that
skilled
workers
should stay in their
own
developing
country
sounds reasonable,
i
think
that
developed
countries
need them more.
Workers with professional competence could gain
many
benefits when moving to affluent
countries
.
First
, Expatriates in
developed
countries
means better career prospects. This means that they could
easily
find a job with high remuneration and
many
benefits in kind, improving their living standards. Second, Working in
developed
nations is
invariably
associated with a liberty from the rigid laws and harsh social norms from the home
country
.
For example
,
many
homosexual individuals in Russia have a propensity to work in other European
countries
because
sodomy means capital punishment.
Third-world
countries
could benefit from allowing their
skilled
workers
to work in other prosperous nations.
First
,
Many
skilled
labourers
from poor
countries
would be conducive to increase in the national incomes of the host
country
. This could
be implied
that this rich
country
would conduct
some
outsourcing investments in the poor
country
such as the establishment of educational institutions with professional training courses or medical institutions with
skilled
medical personnel, which promote the locals’ living standards.
In addition
, Sending the
workers
with high competence could act as an incentive for an improvement in the diplomatic relationship between the poor and the affluent
countries
.
For instance
, As
many
skillful Vietnamese have promoted the working productivity in the United States, Vietnam
now
has been the top priority when American conducts financial assistance
programmes
.
In conclusion
, I believe that third-world
countries
should
send
their professional
workers
to
some
developed
countries
for
some
advantages in terms of living standard improvement and economic development.