Affluent nations regularly give money to underdeveloped countries, yet it does not resolve poverty. Hence, some people assert that rich nations ought to give other types of help to the impoverished countries as opposed to giving financial support. I agree to this viewpoint to a moderate extent.
There are several ways the wealthy nations can support the poor countries in order to help them find solution to poverty with exception of money. Firstly, provision of infrastructures. These are basic physical facilities and organizational structures such as buildings, roads and electricity. For instance, countries like France and Germany had in the past build numerous industries and hospitals in over 50 sub-saharan African nations. As a result, jobs are created to the people thereby alleviating their suffering. Secondly, the high-income countries could also provide scholarships to these poverty-stricken nation. For example, the Chevening awards program from United Kingdom has over the years offered and still offering scholarships to greater number of students from Africa. consequently, developing future leaders who will revert and help build their own nations. This examples illustrates how other ways excluding money can help abate poverty.
In spite of this, I feel that giving financial support is also important in helping the third world countries move out of poverty. For instance, China on a several occasions, has supported Cameroon financially. This has helped to stabilize their economy and also play some part in fighting insurgency. Although this action may seem insignificant but it has actually assisted in one way or the other.
In conclusion, I agree that there are other kinds of support which the developed countries can give to the poor nation in order to assist them fight poverty such as provision of infrastructure and scholarships. however, I also believe that giving financial aid is also significant.
Affluent
nations
regularly
give money to underdeveloped
countries
,
yet
it does not resolve
poverty
.
Hence
,
some
people
assert that rich
nations
ought to give other types of
help
to the impoverished
countries
as opposed to giving financial
support
. I
agree
to this viewpoint to a moderate extent.
There are several ways the wealthy
nations
can
support
the poor
countries
in order to
help
them find solution to
poverty
with
exception of
money.
Firstly
, provision of infrastructures. These are basic physical facilities and organizational structures such as buildings, roads and electricity.
For instance
,
countries
like France and Germany had in the past build numerous industries and hospitals in over 50
sub-saharan
African
nations
.
As a result
, jobs
are created
to the
people
thereby alleviating their suffering.
Secondly
, the high-income
countries
could
also
provide scholarships to these poverty-stricken
nation
.
For example
, the
Chevening
awards program
from United Kingdom
has over the years offered and
still
offering scholarships to greater number of students from Africa.
consequently
, developing future leaders who will revert and
help
build their
own
nations
.
This
examples
illustrates
how other ways excluding money can
help
abate poverty.
In spite of
this, I feel that giving financial
support
is
also
important
in helping the third world
countries
move
out of
poverty
.
For instance
, China on a several occasions, has supported Cameroon
financially
. This has
helped
to stabilize their economy and
also
play
some
part in fighting insurgency. Although this action may seem insignificant
but
it has actually assisted in one way or the other.
In conclusion
, I
agree
that there are other kinds of
support
which the developed
countries
can give to the poor
nation
in order to assist them fight
poverty
such as provision of infrastructure and scholarships.
however
, I
also
believe that giving financial aid is
also
significant.