Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Red lights at the end of the time and the best of the time and the best of the time and the best of the time and the

Red lights at the end of the time and the best of the time and the best of the time and the best of the time and the xP801
In some countries a considerable number of people are said that is totally important to contribute high-speed rails and developing it between Metropolitans; Others argue that spending money should be led in terms of absorbing population attention to public transport. There are rational arguments in both sides of this controversial topic which will be discussed in detailed, followed by my own take of matter. On the one hand, developing and contributing rails are believed to be sufficient; since having high-speed trains are beneficial in terms of long trip, it can be affordable for every single individual. These kinds of transport systems, moreover, are considered as eco-friendly transportation though are not expensive. This view is represented in cities such as Paris, France; Berlin, Germany; and in whole of Europe. On the other hand, the opposing view asserts that it is significant to motivate people to welcome them use any kinds of transportations. There are two reasons why we should support all types of public transportations. Even though some part of transportation can be done by trains, some journeys are not as long as the trip to use rails. Improving people's attentions gained two noticeable benefits. Initially, if individuals use public transport more than private vehicles, it will drastically hit the goal in order to decrease emissions of gasses which are harmful for the Earth. Ultimately, governments of countries who are supportive and provide assistance for their citizen to have a promising transportation to travel with; are able to save money in other demands of their countries. To conclude, there are valid arguments in both sides of controversy; on balance, however it is my firm confliction that absorbing people usage of public transport is much more efficient that only providing railway lines between cities.
In
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
countries a considerable number of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
are said
that is
totally
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
to contribute high-speed rails and developing it between Metropolitans; Others argue that spending money should
be led
in terms of absorbing population attention to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
. There are rational arguments in both sides of this controversial topic which will
be discussed
in detailed, followed by my
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
take of matter.

On the one hand, developing and contributing rails
are believed
to be sufficient; since having high-speed trains are beneficial in terms of long trip, it can be affordable for every single individual. These kinds of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
systems,
moreover
,
are considered
as eco-friendly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
though are not expensive. This view
is represented
in cities such as Paris, France; Berlin, Germany; and in whole of Europe.

On the other hand
, the opposing view asserts that it is significant to motivate
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
to welcome them
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
any kinds of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportations
. There are two reasons why we should support all types of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportations
.
Even though
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
part of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
can
be done
by trains,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
journeys are not as long as the trip to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
rails. Improving
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
's attentions gained two noticeable benefits.

Initially
, if individuals
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
more than private vehicles, it will
drastically
hit the goal in order to decrease emissions of gasses which are harmful for the Earth.

Ultimately
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
of countries who are supportive and provide assistance for their citizen to have a promising
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
to travel with; are able to save money in other demands of their countries.

To conclude
, there are valid arguments in both sides of controversy; on balance,
however
it is my firm confliction that absorbing
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
usage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
is much more efficient that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
providing railway lines between cities.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Red lights at the end of the time and the best of the time and the best of the time and the best of the time and the

Essay
  American English
6 paragraphs
292 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Red lights at the end of the time and the best of the time and the best of the time and the best of the time and the