After replaced by airplanes and helicopters earlier in the 1940s, some engineers still believe that the Airships could be used in the pace of airplanes and helicopters again. Both the lecturer and the reading are on opposite ends about this possibility. The lecturer casts doubt about the claim mentioned in the article and refutes all the ideas presented in the article, while the author of the article offers several theories to justify the replacement of Airships.
According to the article, Airship demands less fuel to run its engine compared to airplanes and helicopters. Nonetheless, the speaker negates the argument presented in the passage. Furthermore, he discusses that Airship requires gas such as Hydrogen and Helium in order to lift in the air which has their own disadvantages. For instance. Hydrogen can easily catch fire that leads to cause major accidents which were very common before the 1940s. Meanwhile, Helium is hard to find and really expensive and also, it does not have lifting power like Hydrogen gas. Hence, even though Airship sounds more economically better, but logically, it is not a safe option.
The passage highlights that Airships have the capacity to carry heavy loads, especially from rural locations. However, the narrator refutes this by asserting that since it required stability and steadiness to carry large and heavy loads in an Airship. Consequently, there is a high chance to occur an accident in the forest because it would be difficult to hold the Airship steady in the air, particularly, during windy conditions.
Last but not least, the text explains that Airship not only can replace the satellite but also helps to save money by using it. On the contrary, the speaker again opposes the theory and describes that it is true that Airships can fly up to a height of 14km from the surface, but at the same time, it needs to face a lot of wind at the height where it will utilize a lot of fuel to resist the wind at this height. Consequently, it demands to refuel it again and again which will make the whole process interrupted. Thus, this substitution is not a fruitful option.
After replaced by airplanes and helicopters earlier in the 1940s,
some
engineers
still
believe that the
Airships
could be
used
in the pace of airplanes and helicopters
again
. Both the lecturer and the reading are on opposite ends about this possibility. The lecturer casts doubt about the claim mentioned in the
article
and refutes all the
ideas
presented in the
article
, while the author of the
article
offers several theories to justify the replacement of Airships.
According to the
article
,
Airship
demands less fuel to run its engine compared to airplanes and helicopters. Nonetheless, the speaker negates the argument presented in the passage.
Furthermore
, he discusses that
Airship
requires gas such as Hydrogen and Helium in order to lift in the air which has their
own
disadvantages.
For instance
. Hydrogen can
easily
catch fire that leads to cause major accidents which were
very
common
before
the 1940s. Meanwhile, Helium is
hard
to find and
really
expensive and
also
, it does not have lifting power like Hydrogen gas.
Hence
,
even though
Airship
sounds more
economically
better,
but
logically
, it is not a safe option.
The passage highlights that
Airships
have the capacity to carry heavy loads,
especially
from rural locations.
However
, the narrator refutes this by asserting that since it required stability and steadiness to carry large and heavy loads in an
Airship
.
Consequently
, there is a high chance to occur an accident in the forest
because
it would be difficult to hold the
Airship
steady in the air,
particularly
, during windy conditions.
Last
but
not least, the text
explains
that
Airship
not
only
can replace the satellite
but
also
helps
to save money by using it.
On the contrary
, the speaker
again
opposes the theory and
describes
that it is true that
Airships
can
fly
up to a height of
14km
from the surface,
but
at the same time, it needs to face
a lot of
wind at the height where it will utilize
a lot of
fuel to resist the wind at this height.
Consequently
, it demands to refuel it
again
and
again
which will
make
the whole process interrupted.
Thus
, this substitution is not a fruitful option.