The article asserts that Pterosaurs were not capable of flying and provides three reasons defending this theory. The professor, on the other hand, refutes all these explanations and declares that recent researches have concluded that they could fly. In the following, these justifications, used to shed light on this controversial argument, will be discussed thoroughly.
First of all, the reading claims that these animals were cold-blooded, and as cold-blooded animals provide less energy in comparison with warm-blooded ones, Pterosaurs were not able to fly due to the lack of energy. Nevertheless, the lecturer announces that new finding from their fossils show that their metabolism was alike warm-blooded animals. They had fur which is typical to warm-blooded animals. This option is useful in maintaining high body temperature; therefore, Pterosaurs could supply enough energy to fly.
Secondly, the essay says that weight of animals is a great limitation on their flying capability, and since pterosaurs were as large as giraffes and so heavy, they could not fly by flapping their wings. The educator rejects this belief and insists that some charactericsitcs of their bodies helped them to keep their weights low although they had big body frames. As she says, their bones were hollow instead of solid which abled them to fly using their wings.
Tertiary, the passage points out that Pterosaurs, unlike birds, could not easily take off from ground. The professor opposes this hypothesis, mainly because she claims that they were different from birds. Birds walk on their two legs and use them for taking off. Pterosarurs, however, walked on four limbs, as some modern birds, and used all of them for taking off. This ability helped even the largest Pterosaurs to run fast or jump high in order to launch to the air with no difficulties.
The article asserts that
Pterosaurs
were not capable of flying and provides three reasons defending this theory. The professor,
on the other hand
, refutes all these explanations and declares that recent researches have concluded that they could
fly
. In the following, these justifications,
used
to shed light on this controversial argument, will
be discussed
thoroughly
.
First of all
, the reading claims that these
animals
were
cold
-blooded, and as
cold
-blooded
animals
provide less energy
in comparison
with warm-blooded ones,
Pterosaurs
were not able to
fly
due to the lack of energy.
Nevertheless
, the lecturer announces that new finding from their fossils
show
that their metabolism was alike warm-blooded
animals
. They had fur which is typical to warm-blooded
animals
. This option is useful in maintaining high body temperature;
therefore
,
Pterosaurs
could supply
enough
energy to
fly
.
Secondly
, the essay says that weight of
animals
is a great limitation on their flying capability, and since
pterosaurs
were as large as giraffes and
so
heavy, they could not
fly
by flapping their wings. The educator rejects this belief and insists that
some
charactericsitcs
of their bodies
helped
them to
keep
their weights low although they had
big
body frames. As she says, their bones were hollow
instead
of solid which
abled
them to
fly
using their wings.
Tertiary, the passage points out that
Pterosaurs
, unlike
birds
, could not
easily
take off from ground. The professor opposes this hypothesis,
mainly
because
she claims that they were
different
from
birds
.
Birds
walk on their two legs and
use
them for taking off.
Pterosarurs
,
however
, walked on four limbs, as
some
modern
birds
, and
used
all of them for taking off. This ability
helped
even the largest
Pterosaurs
to run
fast
or jump high in order to launch to the air with no difficulties.