The reading and lecture are both about some paintings that have been attributed to Rembrandt. Whereas the author of the reading states that ‘portrait of an elderly woman in a white Bonnet’ was not painted by Rembrandt though it has been attributed to him, the lecturer suggests that the painting was officially made by Rembrandt but certain modifications were done to it. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing following three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, there is inconsistency in dressing style of the servant in the portrait. In the painting she wears a luxurious fur coat that a normal servant cannot afford. However, the lecturer disputes this point. She says that from thorough re-examination of the painting, the X-ray of pigments used have shown that the fur coat was not made in the original painting. Furthermore, she mentions that, since some people wanted to make it look formal, they have added it.
Secondly, the reading states that Rembrandt made proper combination of light and shadow unlike the painting that had shown the face illuminated with dark fur collar below the face. The face should appear darker as the dark fur collar would absorb light rather than reflecting it. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. She argues that, in original painting made by Rembrandt there was no fur coat, instead the woman was wearing white collar cloth that illuminated her face.
Finally, the reading claims that the painting was made on a panel made of several wood pieces glued together. Rembrandt never paints on wood panels glued together. On the other hand, the lecturer says that in order to make painting look more grand and valuable, several pieces were glued. In addition, she points that the wood belonged to same tree used by Rembrandt.
In Conclusion, although the reading and the lecture both argue about whether some paintings that have been credited to Rembrandt were originally painted by him or not, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
The
reading
and lecture are both about
some
paintings
that have
been attributed
to Rembrandt. Whereas the author of the
reading
states that ‘portrait of an elderly woman in a white Bonnet’ was not painted by Rembrandt though it has
been attributed
to him, the
lecturer
suggests that the
painting
was
officially
made by Rembrandt
but
certain modifications
were done
to it. The
lecturer
casts doubt on the main
points
made in the
reading
by providing following three reasons.
First of all
, according to the
reading
, there is inconsistency in dressing style of the servant in the portrait. In the
painting
she wears a luxurious
fur
coat that a normal servant cannot afford.
However
, the
lecturer
disputes this
point
. She says that from thorough re-examination of the
painting
, the X-ray of pigments
used
have shown that the
fur
coat was not made in the original
painting
.
Furthermore
, she mentions that, since
some
people
wanted to
make
it look formal, they have
added
it.
Secondly
, the
reading
states that Rembrandt made proper combination of light and shadow unlike the
painting
that had shown the face illuminated with dark
fur
collar below the face. The face should appear darker as the dark
fur
collar would absorb light
rather
than reflecting it.
Nevertheless
, the
lecturer
refutes this argument. She argues that, in original
painting
made by Rembrandt there was no
fur
coat,
instead
the woman was wearing white collar cloth that illuminated her face.
Finally
, the
reading
claims that the
painting
was made
on a panel made of several wood pieces glued together. Rembrandt never paints on wood panels glued together.
On the other hand
, the
lecturer
says that in order to
make
painting
look more grand and valuable, several pieces
were glued
.
In addition
, she
points
that the wood belonged to same tree
used
by Rembrandt.
In Conclusion
, although the
reading
and the lecture both argue about whether
some
paintings
that have
been credited
to Rembrandt were
originally
painted by him or not, the three main
points
made in the
reading
are
effectively
challenged by the
lecturer
.