While some argue that university students ought to choose preferred subjects, others think what they learn should be inextricably entwined to some practical areas. I reckon that it is more important for them to study something wanted.
It' s understandable that useful subjects should be studied by college students. Because it' s a person with limited and energy and he or she is required to adapt the inevitably changing world. He or she need to optimize their resources in university, which means learning some scientific or technical knowledge and skills is essential. Computer science, for example, without a doubt is a demanding and handy subject which can be connected to machine learning or even artificial intelligence which we need compellingly in the future.
Although it is reasonable to learn practical curriculum at school, I agree with the view that subjects had better be specified as per students' eagerness. Multifarious points could endorse the opinion. Firstly, college students will be more passionate in learning preferred areas. And they may learn their own fields more efficiently, even can extend some new branches related to their professions. For instance, archaeology may be a less handy subject compared to science and technology. However, in the modern era, some scholars have already applied it to deter crime, by figuring out human' s regular activities then mixing it up with big data as well as data mining even AI. It would be beneficial for public security. By contrast, if students don' t like or even detest specific curriculum, they might give no energy so that they can not utilize this knowledge or skills, despite these subjects seem practical.
To recapitulate, while it is sometimes true for college students learn what will be drown upon in the long run, I believe they should study whatever that love and give passion into.
While
some
argue that university
students
ought to choose preferred
subjects
, others
think
what they
learn
should be
inextricably
entwined to
some
practical areas. I reckon that it is more
important
for them to study something wanted.
It&
#039; s understandable that useful
subjects
should
be studied
by college
students
.
Because
it&
#039; s a person with limited and
energy and
he or she
is required
to adapt the
inevitably
changing world. He or she need to optimize their resources in university, which means learning
some
scientific or technical knowledge and
skills
is essential. Computer science,
for example
, without a doubt is a demanding and handy
subject
which can
be connected
to machine learning or even artificial intelligence which we need
compellingly
in the future.
Although it is reasonable to
learn
practical curriculum at school, I
agree
with the view that
subjects
had better
be specified
as per
students&
#039; eagerness. Multifarious points could endorse the opinion.
Firstly
, college
students
will be more passionate in learning preferred areas. And they may
learn
their
own
fields more
efficiently
, even can extend
some
new branches related to their professions.
For instance
, archaeology may be a less handy
subject
compared to science and technology.
However
, in the modern era,
some
scholars have already applied it to deter crime, by figuring out
human&
#039; s regular activities then mixing it up with
big
data
as well
as data mining even AI. It would be beneficial for public security. By contrast, if
students
don&
#039; t like or even detest specific curriculum, they might give no energy
so
that they can not utilize this knowledge or
skills
, despite these
subjects
seem practical.
To recapitulate, while it is
sometimes
true for college
students
learn
what will be
drown
upon in the long run, I believe they should study whatever that
love
and give passion into.