The existence of teachers and students together in a classroom in the next 30 years is debatable. Some people claim that by 2050 the conventional classroom concept of learners and educators under one roof will be completely transformed. I totally disagree with this statement for few reasons like teachers are essential for the guidance and motivation.
Firstly, these lectures will always guide the pupils in the proper direction. However, computers may give all the choices, but it cannot insist a learner to follow the right path. Further, teachers being the pedagogical experts teach pupils in an interesting manner. In addition, students can interact with them and discuss complex subjects nevertheless, any number of online tuitions may not simplify the concepts. For instance, despite significant research in the category of medical sciences till date there is no substitute for blood. Similarly, by 2050 there may be a number of innovations in the field of education, however it cannot replace a teacher.
Secondly, these mentors are the best motivators. They can be an inspiration for a below average student because they can understand their weak areas and encourage them to overcome their shortfalls. Therefore, it is possible only by interacting in a classroom between learners and educators. For example, I always wanted to become a professor since my childhood because of the influence of my primary teachers. So this concept of motivation can only be possible if there is a healthy interaction with the schools.
To conclude, although there might be considerable changes in the system of education by the year 2050 still the classroom learning with a lecturer and a pupil cannot be substituted. A student cannot achieve anything without guidance and motivation from a mentor.
The existence of
teachers
and
students
together in a classroom in the
next
30 years is debatable.
Some
people
claim that by 2050 the conventional classroom concept of learners and educators under one roof will be completely transformed. I
totally
disagree with this statement for few reasons like
teachers
are essential for the guidance and motivation.
Firstly
, these lectures will always guide the pupils in the proper direction.
However
, computers may give all the choices,
but
it cannot insist a learner to follow the right path.
Further
,
teachers
being the pedagogical experts teach pupils
in an interesting manner
.
In addition
,
students
can interact with them and discuss complex subjects
nevertheless
, any number of online
tuitions
may not simplify the concepts.
For instance
, despite significant research in the category of medical sciences till date there is no substitute for blood.
Similarly
, by 2050 there may be a number of innovations in the field of education,
however
it cannot replace a teacher.
Secondly
, these mentors are the best motivators. They can be an inspiration for a below average
student
because
they can understand their weak areas and encourage them to overcome their shortfalls.
Therefore
, it is possible
only
by interacting in a classroom between learners and educators.
For example
, I always wanted to become a professor since my childhood
because
of the influence of my primary
teachers
.
So
this concept of motivation can
only
be possible if there is a healthy interaction with the schools.
To conclude
, although there might be considerable
changes
in the system of education by the year 2050
still
the classroom learning with a lecturer and a pupil cannot
be substituted
. A
student
cannot achieve anything without guidance and motivation from a mentor.