Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Q-A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

From centuries animals had been utilized by humans for their needs such as agriculture, food, commutation etc. some people argue and raised voices against this practices and think animals should have rights such as humans. Below paragraphs would provide assertion on the contention before deducing a plausible conclusion. Firstly, humans are most evolved species in the eco-system which means it can dictate the rules of the system. Teeth of humans are designed to eat fresh thus nutrients which are not available in vegetation should be gain through animals. For example, fiber and vitamin B12 are available only in fish. Pharma companies need someone similar to humans for research of medicines. Various space programs also need animals for exploring outer space, this is required to gauge the condition whether they are suitable to send humans or not. Some people opine that animals too have life and feels the pain when hurts. People with spiritual and religious thoughts consider animal auspicious and worship them. Exploring alternative of animals are always recommended by them. Human should depend only on the vegetables for all source of nutrients and minerals. People also consider killing some of the animals as unlawful such as cows. To recapitulate, animals should be used for making human life more comfortable and sustainable. In my opinion, animals should be considered for research and food so that entire eco-system remain unaffected

From centuries You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 had been utilized
 by You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 for their needs such as agriculture, food, commutation etc. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 argue and raised voices against ‘This’ does not seem to match the plural noun ‘practices’. Did you mean “these”?these
this
 practices and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 should have rights such as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
. Below paragraphs would provide assertion on the contention This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
 deducing a plausible conclusion.

Firstly
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 are most evolved species in the eco-system which means it can dictate the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirements
rules
 of the system. Teeth of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
are designed
 to eat fresh thus
 nutrients which are not available in vegetation should be gain through You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
. For example
, fiber and vitamin B12 are available This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 in fish. Pharma This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :enterprisescorporations
companies
 need someone similar to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 for research of medicines. Various space programs also
 need You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 for exploring outer space, this is required
 to gauge the condition whether they are suitable to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :transmit
send
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 or not.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 opine that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
Did you mean “to have”?to have
too have
 life and feels the pain when hurts. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
People
 with spiritual and religious thoughts consider You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 auspicious and worship them. Exploring alternative of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are always recommended by them. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
Human
 should depend This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 on the vegetables for all source of nutrients and minerals. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
People
also
 consider killing If the text is a generality, ‘of the’ is not necessary.some
some of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 as unlawful such as cows.

To recapitulate, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 should be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 for making You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 life more comfortable and sustainable. In my opinion, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 should be considered
 for research and food This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 that entire eco-system remain Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph.unaffected.unaffected!unaffected?unaffected:unaffected,unaffected;
unaffected