Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that it is wrong to test new medicines on animals. Do you think the advantages of testing new medicines on animals outweigh the disadvantages?

It is argued by many people that testing new medicines on animals is morally wrong. In my perspective, the benefits issues are more prevalent. Undoubtedly, there are several drawbacks of animal experiments. Firstly, it is cruel. Because they have the right to live and researchers use animals to test new medicine is brutal inhumane. As a result, they may be suffering pain and both mentally and physically. Furthermore, sometimes an experiment on animals gives us the wrong result because animal’s bodies are not exactly the same as our own. As a consequence, the medicine that works on animals may not work on humans, and this testing might not be providing safety. However, it plays an indispensable role in testing new medicine. The biggest advantage to the use of animals in medicine is reducing the risk of humans. If scientists test a new medicine on humans. It can lead to unwanted side effects or lead to death. Besides, it allows researchers to explore a range of conditions such as cancer, heart disease, and stroke. Another benefit, doing animal experiments is very cost-effective. It is not only cheap but also easy to buy samples. Consequently, Scientists can do different tests sometimes. In conclusion, despite the drawbacks of testing new medicines on animals. I believe the benefits outweigh the disadvantages and it is very important for the future of medical science.
It
is argued
by
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
medicines on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
is
morally
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
. In my perspective, the benefits issues are more prevalent.

Undoubtedly
, there are several drawbacks of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
experiments.
Firstly
, it is cruel.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Because
they have the right to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
and researchers
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medicine
is brutal inhumane.
As a result
, they may be suffering pain and both mentally and
physically
.
Furthermore
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
an experiment on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
gives us the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
result
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal’s
bodies are not exactly the same as our
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
. As a consequence, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medicine
that works on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
may not work on humans, and this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
might not be providing safety.

However
, it plays an indispensable role in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medicine
. The biggest advantage to the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medicine
is reducing the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
risk
of humans.
“If” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
If
scientists
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medicine
on humans. It can lead to unwanted side effects or lead to death.
Besides
, it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
allows
researchers to explore a range of conditions such as cancer, heart disease, and stroke. Another benefit, doing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
experiments is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
cost-effective. It is not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
cheap
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
easy to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
buy
samples.
Consequently
, Scientists can do
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
.

In conclusion
, despite the drawbacks of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
medicines on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
. I believe the benefits outweigh the
Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
disadvantages and
it is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
for the future of medical science.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people believe that it is wrong to test new medicines on animals. Do you think the advantages of testing new medicines on animals outweigh the disadvantages?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
228 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts