Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Pros and cons of tighter gun control

Pros and cons of tighter gun control QKgq9
Whether a tough policy related to selling and purchasing firearms needs imposing has arisen numerous controversies. In this essay, I will shed light on both the positive and negative sides of that legislation. To begin with, tighter gun control is a prerequisite for a peaceful country. First and foremost, firearms are one of the culprits of innocent citizens’ mortalities along with injuries. It is criminals and terrorists who will harness that deadly weapon to intimate others and carry out evil plots, such as bank robbing or forcing the government to concede authority. Moreover, by virtue of legally purchasing guns, there is an increase in the number of manslaughters and homicides annually. To exemplify, in America, a little child shot his father by chance when holding a firearm. Hence, without the policy, the state can not ensure dwellers’ welfare and reduce the risks of bloody massacres. Secondly, the control on guns tends to inhibit violent culture among children. To be specific, witnessing adults’ using that weapon spoils and corrupts children’s minds. Unless they are educated regularly, they will mislead the purpose of these fatal tools and develop aggressive behaviors while solving conflicts. However, imposing a restriction on firearms triggers some repercussions for individuals and the whole society. At the individual level, guns act as a means of self-defense. In other words, a house equipped with a gun is not likely to be assaulted. By contrast, armless people, especially women and the weak, will be the subject of offenders. At a communal level, people will utilize extremely perilous alternatives to commit a crime. Although the law can enhance the safety of dwellers in the short term, in the long run, it will prompt bad evils to produce homemade explosives with greater destructive power and pave the way for knife attacks, for instance. Not only do these weapons require more effort and resources to tackle, but they also cause more unexpected damage to mankind. In conclusion, harsher gun control can bring benefits as well as pose a threat to the community. The government should consider thoroughly before implementing laws on public use of firearms to protect citizens and deter crimes.
Whether a tough policy related to selling and purchasing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
firearms
needs imposing has arisen numerous controversies. In this essay, I will shed light on both the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
sides of that legislation.

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, tighter
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gun
control is a prerequisite for a peaceful country.
First
and foremost,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
firearms
are one of the culprits of innocent citizens’
Possible spelling mistake found.
mortalities
along with injuries. It is criminals and terrorists who will harness that deadly weapon to intimate others and carry out evil plots, such as bank robbing or forcing the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
to concede authority.
Moreover
, by virtue of
legally
purchasing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
guns
, there is an increase in the number of
Possible spelling mistake found.
manslaughters
and homicides
annually
. To exemplify, in America, a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
child shot his father by chance when holding a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
firearm
.
Hence
, without the policy, the state can not ensure dwellers’ welfare and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
risks
of bloody massacres.
Secondly
, the control on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
guns
tends to inhibit violent culture among children. To be specific, witnessing adults’ using that weapon spoils and corrupts children’s minds. Unless they
are educated
regularly
, they will mislead the purpose of these fatal tools and develop aggressive behaviors while solving conflicts.

However
, imposing a restriction on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
firearms
triggers
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
repercussions for individuals and the whole society. At the individual level,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
guns
act as a means of self-defense.
In other words
, a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
house
equipped with a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gun
is not likely to
be assaulted
. By contrast,
Possible spelling mistake found.
armless
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
,
especially
women and the weak, will be the subject of offenders. At a communal level,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
will utilize
extremely
perilous alternatives to commit a crime. Although the law can enhance the safety of dwellers in the short term, in the long run, it will prompt
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bad
evils to produce homemade explosives with greater destructive power and pave the way for knife attacks,
for instance
. Not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
do these weapons require more effort and resources to tackle,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
they
also
cause more unexpected damage to mankind.

In conclusion
, harsher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gun
control can bring benefits
as well
as pose a threat to the community. The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
should consider
thoroughly
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
implementing laws on public
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
firearms
to protect citizens and deter crimes.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Pros and cons of tighter gun control

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
357 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Pros and cons of tighter gun control