Modern households will inevitably produce some waste, but the increasing volumes
of refuse over recent years present a challenge for us all. There seem to be two main problems
stemming from this situation, and also two steps we could take to address it fully.
Possible the major problem is the huge question of how to collect, process, and dispose of this
material. Household waste comprises elements ranging from foodstuffs to metal, paper, and plastics,
and local authorities sometimes struggle to handle such a diverse mix of materials. The historical
solution has been incineration or landfill, but the problems of pollution and long-term ground16
contamination that arises has led to widespread efforts to recycle at least some of the waste. This
leads us to the second concern, which is the high cost of disposing of refuse in an ecologically sound
manner. We would all wish as much as possible for our rubbish to be recycled (for example by paper
pulping or reusing plastics) but the expense involved must be met by higher taxes and charges for
households.
Regarding possible solutions, probably the most immediate short-term solution would be to
divert far more government funds into waste processing and recycling facilities at a local level. This
would reduce the environmental impact of the waste by reducing pollution, and also lower our
demand for raw materials, as more recycled products would consequently be produced. A further,
longer-term solution might be to raise the level of public understanding of the need to consume less
material in households, especially in terms of packaging and wasted food. A campaign of education
along these lines would gradually lessen the volume of waste, especially if reinforced by incentives
for consuming less and penalties for excessive waste, as we see being trialed in the UK at present.
Overall, the main problems are both environmental and financial. The possible solutions
involve more immediate investment in facilities, and also encouraging long-term changes in
household behavior.
Modern households will
inevitably
produce
some
waste
,
but
the increasing volumes
of refuse over recent years present a challenge for us all. There seem to be two main problems
stemming from this situation, and
also
two steps we could take to address it
fully
.
Possible the major problem is the huge question of how to collect, process, and dispose of this
material. Household
waste
comprises elements ranging from foodstuffs to metal, paper, and plastics,
and local authorities
sometimes
struggle to handle such a diverse mix of materials. The historical
solution has been incineration or landfill,
but
the problems of pollution and long-term ground16
contamination that arises has led to widespread efforts to recycle at least
some of the
waste
. This
leads us to the second concern, which is the high cost of disposing of refuse in an
ecologically
sound
manner. We would all wish as much as possible for our rubbish to
be recycled
(
for example
by paper
pulping or reusing plastics)
but
the expense involved
must
be met
by higher taxes and charges for
households.
Regarding possible solutions,
probably
the most immediate short-term solution would be to
divert far more
government
funds into
waste
processing and recycling facilities at a local level. This
would
reduce
the environmental impact of the
waste
by reducing pollution, and
also
lower our
demand for raw materials, as more recycled products would
consequently
be produced
. A
further
,
longer-term solution might be to raise the level of public understanding of the need to consume less
material in households,
especially
in terms of packaging and wasted food. A campaign of education
along these lines would
gradually
lessen the volume of
waste
,
especially
if reinforced by incentives
for consuming less and penalties for excessive
waste
, as we
see
being trialed
in the UK at present.
Overall
, the main problems are both environmental and financial. The possible solutions
involve more immediate investment in facilities, and
also
encouraging long-term
changes
in
household behavior.