Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Plastic'shopping'bags'contribute'to'pollution'of'land'and'sea.'Some'people'think'they' should'be'banned.'To'what'extent'do'you'agree'or'disagree?'

Plastic'shopping'bags'contribute'to'pollution'of'land'and'sea. 'Some'people'think'they' should'be'banned. 'To'what'extent'do'you'agree'or'disagree? ' pRKla
Banned Plastic In Not Always The Best Solution For Environment In 1950 the world produces plastics only 2 million tonnes per year. Since then, annual production has increased by nearly 200-fold, reaching 381 million tonnes in 2015. For context, this is roughly equivalent to the mass of two-thirds of the world population. The packaging was the dominant use of primary plastics, with 42 percent of plastics entering the use phase. Talking about the campaign to reduce the plastic used or banned especially shopping bag mostly people agree with the program. Besides there are a lot of advantages that we can get from banned plastics, actually plastics give contributions to the environment like pollution in the land and ocean, a similar problem that happens if all the consumers substitute it with paper bags, and in terms of the climate change. Some people deny that the plastic bags used in supermarkets and shops have a negative effect on the environment because they do not know about degrade and end up as litter in our cities or oceans. Published in the journal Science in February 2015, a study conducted by a scientific working group at UC Santa Barbara’s National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS), quantified the input of plastic waste from land into the ocean. The results: every year, 8 million metric tons of plastic end up in our oceans. It’s equivalent to five grocery bags filled with plastic for every foot of coastline in the world. In 2025, the annual input is estimated to be about twice greater, or 10 bags full of plastic per foot of coastline. So the cumulative input for 2025 would be nearly 20 times the 8 million metric tons estimate – 100 bags of plastic per foot of coastline in the world. Banning plastics bags below a specific thickness is a prudent strategy to prevent pollution of land and water. These bags are so thin that they can get easily torn and can not be recycled. Consequently, they are not properly disposed of and stay in the local ecosystem for more than 600 years. This often leads to the pollution of underground water when rainfall on these bags and absorb certain plastic material. Moreover, sometimes stray animal consumes them and fall sick. This eventually to the death of these animals and the spread of disease among the human population. Most people who advocate banning plastic bags suggest paper bags (which are biodegradable) or reusable bags that are typically made from cotton or plastic. The replacements for plastic bags also carry significant environmental risks. Both of these replacements are flawed. Paper bags require us to continue clearing forests and also carry a large carbon footprint. Reusable bags are plagued by similar problems. Independent studies have shown that the production of cotton and reusable plastic causes more harm to the environment than disposable plastic bags. Coupled with the fact that reusable bags are more difficult to recycle, their overall effect on the environment is worse. The final argument some people often not know that plastic bags are non-recyclable. Not all plastic bags are non-recyclable. Those a certain thickness do not hear and are easily and hence, they can be responsibly disposed and recycled. Governments should enforce strictly the regulation, people will continue to flout the recycling and minimum thickness norm. If these are properly recycled and this will not only reduce the mountain of the plastic waste of various dumping grounds but also reduce pollution of the river and as well as ground pollution. This is crucial, not only in the understanding of the problem but implementing the most effective interventions for reduction. However, instead of banning plastic, it should be recycled, reduce, and more to reuse. Despite the advantages of banning plastic bags, the solutions for plastic bags are worse than the original problem. So, use what we have and use it continuously if it is broken we will fix it the big point is don’t use once and we throw it.
Banned
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Plastic
In Not Always The Best Solution For Environment

In 1950 the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
produces
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastics
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
2
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes per year. Since then, annual production has increased by
nearly
200-fold, reaching 381
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes in 2015. For context, this is roughly equivalent to the mass of two-thirds of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
population. The packaging was the dominant
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of primary
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastics
, with 42 percent of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastics
entering the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
phase. Talking about the campaign to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reduce
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
or banned
especially
shopping
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bag
mostly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with the program.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Besides
there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
advantages that we can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
from banned
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastics
, actually
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastics
give contributions to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
like
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
in the land and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ocean
, a similar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problem
that happens if all the consumers substitute it with paper
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
, and in terms of the climate
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
deny that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
in supermarkets and shops have a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
effect on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
they do not know about degrade and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
up as litter in our cities or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oceans
. Published in the journal Science in February 2015, a study conducted by a scientific working group at UC Santa Barbara’s National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (
Possible spelling mistake found.
NCEAS
), quantified the input of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
waste from land into the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ocean
. The results: every year, 8
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
metric tons of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
up in our
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oceans
. It’s equivalent to five grocery
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
filled with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
for every foot of coastline in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
. In 2025, the annual input
is estimated
to be about twice greater, or 10
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
full of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
per foot of coastline.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
the cumulative input for 2025 would be
nearly
20 times the 8
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
metric tons estimate
Consider using an m-dash if you do not want to join two words.
–
100
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
per foot of coastline in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Banning
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastics
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
below a specific thickness is a prudent strategy to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
of land and water. These
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
thin that they can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
easily
torn and can not be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycled
.
Consequently
, they are not
properly
disposed of and stay in the local ecosystem for more than 600 years. This
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
leads to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
of underground water when rainfall on these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
and absorb certain
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
material.
Moreover
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
stray animal consumes them and fall sick. This
eventually
to the death of these animals and the spread of disease among the human population.

Most
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who advocate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
banning
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
suggest paper
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
(which are biodegradable) or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reusable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
that are
typically
made from cotton or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
. The replacements for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
also
carry significant environmental
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
risks
. Both of these replacements
are flawed
. Paper
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
require us to continue clearing forests and
also
carry a large carbon footprint.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Reusable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
are plagued
by similar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problems
. Independent studies have shown that the production of cotton and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reusable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
causes more harm to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
than disposable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
. Coupled with the fact that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reusable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
are more difficult to recycle, their
overall
effect on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
is worse.

The final argument
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
not know that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
are non-recyclable. Not all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
are non-recyclable. Those a certain thickness do not hear and are
easily
and
hence
, they can be
responsibly
disposed and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycled
.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Governments
should enforce
strictly
the regulation,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will continue to flout the recycling and minimum thickness norm. If these are
properly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycled
and this will not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reduce
the mountain of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
waste of various dumping grounds
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reduce
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
of the river and
as well
as ground pollution.

This is crucial, not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
in the understanding of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problem
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
implementing the most effective interventions for reduction.
However
,
instead
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
banning
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
, it should be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycled
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reduce
, and more to reuse. Despite the advantages of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
banning
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
, the solutions for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plastic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bags
are worse than the original
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problem
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
what we have and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
it
continuously
if it
is broken
we will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
fix
it the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
point is don’t
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
once and
we throw it.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Plastic'shopping'bags'contribute'to'pollution'of'land'and'sea. 'Some'people'think'they' should'be'banned. 'To'what'extent'do'you'agree'or'disagree? '

Essay
  American English
6 paragraphs
666 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts