In this present world, the usage of technology is constantly on the rise. Even classrooms are among the many places that enjoy the usage and benefits of technology. The argument that classroom teachers will be totally substituted for technology is an argument that is both agreed and disagreed with by many. The two sides of this argument will be thoroughly analysed and discussed in this essay before drawing a reasoned conclusion.
Firstly, the advancement rate at which technology is capable of mimicking the physical and psychological abilities of humans is quite remarkable. For instance, the Honda robot Asimov has a movable body and can manipulate objects just as perfect as humans. Thus the prospect of technology being used to teach students in the classroom is considerable. This is why it can be argued that classroom teachers could be totally substituted for technology.
Nevertheless, a robotic teacher made with artificial intelligence would lack sufficient control over its classroom students. For instance, it is widely known that kids need to be thoroughly watched by their teachers to be sure that they take their class works seriously and do not fool around when classes are going on. Sadly, this is a task robotic teachers will be incapable of carrying out. Therefore, this makes it clear that classroom teachers will never be totally substituted for technology.
To summarise, the two sides of the argument concerning the prospect of robotic teachers in school have strong supports. However, after thorough analysis of both sides, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. It is therefore predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.
In this present world, the usage of
technology
is
constantly
on the rise. Even classrooms are among the
many
places that enjoy the usage and benefits of
technology
. The
argument
that classroom
teachers
will be
totally
substituted for
technology
is an
argument
that is
both
agreed
and disagreed with by
many
. The two sides of this
argument
will be
thoroughly
analysed
and discussed in this essay
before
drawing a reasoned conclusion.
Firstly
, the advancement rate at which
technology
is capable of mimicking the physical and psychological abilities of humans is quite remarkable.
For instance
, the Honda robot Asimov has a movable body and can manipulate objects
just
as perfect as humans.
Thus
the prospect of
technology
being
used
to teach students in the classroom is considerable. This is why it can
be argued
that classroom
teachers
could be
totally
substituted for technology.
Nevertheless
, a robotic
teacher
made with artificial intelligence would lack sufficient control over its classroom students.
For instance
, it is
widely
known that kids need to be
thoroughly
watched
by their
teachers
to be sure that they take their
class
works
seriously
and do not fool around when classes are going on.
Sadly
, this is a task robotic
teachers
will be incapable of carrying out.
Therefore
, this
makes
it
clear
that classroom
teachers
will never be
totally
substituted for technology.
To
summarise
, the two sides of the
argument
concerning the prospect of robotic
teachers
in school have strong supports.
However
, after thorough analysis of both sides, it is
clear
that the
idea
of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot
be supported
. It is
therefore
predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the
positive
effects, and
because of this
, classroom
teachers
will never
be substituted
for
technology
.