In our modern society, it is argued by many that past midnight no one under the age of 18 should be allowed to go outside, while critics dispute this suggestion. In my opinion, there are several flaws in the reasoning behind this view, and it would be wiser to search for the alternatives. In this essay, I shall further analyse both points of view and outline relevant examples to support my perspective.
On one hand, there are numerous issues with the approach of enforcing a law to prevent people of the younger generation from leaving their house. However, one of the main problems is its impracticality. Firstly, it is not a practical solution, because certain situations may require children to go outside, and it is not possible to judge who's situation should be prioritised. For example, today, schools and colleges stay open for longer hours, leaving less time for any other activity. Because of this, younger people often take late-night classes for coachings or tuitions. In such a case, this law may cause some serious issues with their studies.
On the other hand, imposing this regulation, could have some advantages. First, it may help in reducing the number of accidents from rash driving especially during midnight. For example, a recent survey conducted by the Oxford University, revealed that 8 out of 10 children, drives over the speed limit at night. These findings further validate that this regulation should be plcaed.
In conclusion, this is topic which raises many questions in the contemporary life. After a thorough examination of the subject, I am inclined to say that the negatives that will result from such a law outweigh the benefits.
In our modern society, it
is argued
by
many
that past midnight no one under the age of 18 should be
allowed
to go outside, while critics dispute this suggestion. In my opinion, there are several flaws in the reasoning behind this view, and it would be wiser to search for the alternatives.
In
this essay, I shall
further
analyse
both points of view and outline relevant examples to support my perspective.
On one hand, there are numerous issues with the approach of enforcing a law to
prevent
people
of the younger generation from leaving their
house
.
However
, one of the main problems is its impracticality.
Firstly
, it is not a practical solution,
because
certain situations may require children to go outside, and it is not possible to judge
who's situation
should be
prioritised
.
For example
,
today
, schools and colleges stay open for longer hours, leaving less time for any other activity.
Because of this
, younger
people
often
take late-night classes for
coachings
or
tuitions
. In such a case, this law may cause
some
serious issues with their studies.
On the other hand
, imposing this regulation, could have
some
advantages.
First
, it may
help
in reducing the number of accidents from rash driving
especially
during midnight.
For example
, a recent survey conducted by the Oxford University, revealed that 8 out of 10 children, drives over the speed limit at night. These findings
further
validate that this regulation should be
plcaed
.
In conclusion
, this is topic which raises
many
questions in the contemporary life. After a thorough examination of the subject, I
am inclined
to say that the negatives that will result from such a law outweigh the benefits.