People are facing the dilemma of whether education or incarceration is a superior avenue when it comes to combating offences. Recently, this phenomenon has been brought to public attention with people standing on two different sides. Even though it can be stated that incarceration has the ability to rigorously train offenders, I would argue that education is way greater and more benevolent.
On one side of the argument, there are many who claim that prison conveys a strong message to would-be criminals. To begin with, incarceration is representative of the legal deterrent. This means that when someone desires to undertake unlawful, he or she will see a jail as a place where they would face punishments that cause them bodily and emotional agony. Another reason is that prisons keep the community safe from further harm. By virtue of the fact that it demonstrates justice, restoring equality to the citizens is a top priority obligation. As a result, prisons have helped minimize the number of victims.
However, I would be inclined to argue against this as I believed that education can raise people’s awareness of the consequences of offences and regulations. First of all, education is now the government's primary focus. This might be explained by the fact that a person can be imparted good knowledge what about the active and proper in life, they will steady work and open career prospects. On the contrary, if they lack fundamental education, they will disrupt social security and become criminals. A further rationale is that education helps tackle the root of crimes. Under certain assumptions, this can be construed as prisoners before being released from jail should receive thorough training, not reluctantly take advice from the authorities. And reformed offenders will change their minds.
The obvious conclusion to be drawn is that education penetrates deeply into people’s minds to help them be aware of their behaviour. And help to deter teenagers from committing crimes today.
People
are facing the dilemma of whether
education
or incarceration is a superior avenue when it
comes
to combating
offences
. Recently, this phenomenon has
been brought
to public attention with
people
standing on two
different
sides.
Even though
it can
be stated
that incarceration has the ability to
rigorously
train offenders, I would argue that
education
is way greater and more benevolent.
On one side of the argument, there are
many
who claim that prison conveys a strong message to would-be criminals. To
begin
with, incarceration is representative of the legal deterrent. This means that when someone desires to undertake unlawful, he or she will
see
a jail as a place where they would face punishments that cause them
bodily
and emotional agony. Another reason is that prisons
keep
the community safe from
further
harm. By virtue of the fact that it demonstrates justice, restoring equality to the citizens is a top priority obligation.
As a result
, prisons have
helped
minimize the number of victims.
However
, I would
be inclined
to argue against this as I believed that
education
can raise
people’s
awareness of the consequences of
offences
and regulations.
First of all
,
education
is
now
the
government
's primary focus. This might be
explained
by the fact that a person can
be imparted
good
knowledge what about the active and proper in life, they will steady work and open career prospects.
On the contrary
, if they lack fundamental
education
, they will disrupt social security and become criminals. A
further
rationale is that
education
helps
tackle the root of crimes. Under certain assumptions, this can
be construed
as prisoners
before
being released
from jail should receive thorough training, not
reluctantly
take advice from the authorities. And reformed offenders will
change
their minds.
The obvious conclusion to
be drawn
is that
education
penetrates
deeply
into
people’s
minds to
help
them be aware of their
behaviour
. And
help
to deter
teenagers
from committing crimes
today
.