Opinions are divided on whether newspapers or other forms of media, like the
Internet are the dominant method in acquiring news. Personally, I agree with those
who advocate online-platforms are indeed superior to that traditional version.
Admittedly, the idea of considering newspapers as the foremost way to get news is
justifiable. This is predicated on the assumption that such a measure would provide
people with a more reliable source of information. Take, for example, a piece of
news on newspapers before being taken to publication is often written by
professional journalists, carefully checked and edited to ensure the acuracy.
Undoubtedly, if people are constantly exposed to fake news that spreading widely
on the other media, especially the Internet, they are much more likely to have
misconception and unexpected worries. Therefore, many people argue that this
traditional method still holds the most popular position among readers.
However, there are good reasons to say that the advantages of online news
significantly surpass those of newspapers. Chief of these is that the omnipresence
and the availability of the internet devices have boosted the popularity of online
news to an extent that makes the way of getting news from newspapers become
obsolete and inconvenient. Thanks to internet-based platforms, readers can access
a huge storage of fast-moving and immediate news updates by only a few clicks.
Furthermore, online media can upload videos as opposed to newspapers, which is
only able to supply information with written words. For instance, people can watch
vivid videos and rewatch them if unfortunately missed with portable devices
connected to the Internet.
In conclusion, although newspapers are deemed more reliable, I firmly support the
tendency that it has been on the wane and no longer the best way to get news due
to a superior experience provided by online platforms
Opinions
are divided
on whether
newspapers
or other forms of media, like the
Internet are the dominant method in acquiring
news
.
Personally
, I
agree
with those
who advocate online-platforms are
indeed
superior to that traditional version.
Admittedly
, the
idea
of considering
newspapers
as the foremost way to
get
news
is
justifiable. This
is predicated
on the assumption that such a measure would provide
people
with a more reliable source of information. Take,
for example
, a piece of
news on
newspapers
before
being taken
to publication is
often
written by
professional journalists,
carefully
checked
and edited to ensure the
acuracy
.
Undoubtedly
, if
people
are
constantly
exposed to fake
news
that spreading
widely
on the other media,
especially
the Internet, they are much more likely to have
misconception and unexpected worries.
Therefore
,
many
people
argue that this
traditional method
still
holds the most popular position among readers.
However
, there are
good
reasons to say that the advantages of online news
significantly
surpass those of
newspapers
. Chief of these is that the omnipresence
and the availability of the internet devices have boosted the popularity of online
news to an extent that
makes
the way of getting
news
from
newspapers
become
obsolete and inconvenient. Thanks to internet-based platforms, readers can access
a huge storage of
fast
-moving and immediate
news
updates by
only
a few clicks.
Furthermore
, online media can upload videos as opposed to
newspapers
, which is
only
able to supply information with written words.
For instance
,
people
can
watch
vivid videos and
rewatch
them if unfortunately missed with portable devices
connected to the Internet.
In conclusion
, although
newspapers
are deemed
more reliable, I
firmly
support the
tendency that it has been on the wane and no longer the best way to
get
news
due
to a superior experience provided by online platforms