There have been calls for large corporations to build sports and social facilities for the local communities where they operate. In my view, I would agree on the grounds that these facilities can strengthen communal bonds and promote a company’s image in a positive light.
Firstly, as most people are increasingly beset with professional and familial duties, they often lack the time to participate in communal activities and forge meaningful connections with one another. By constructing sports and social facilities, these companies can grant these people the appropriate setting for them to participate in common activities. This is evident in cities well-known for quality of life such as Hanoi where most of the parks there have been built by Vinaconex, one of the largest companies in Vietnam. Hence, most of the local denizens are able to engage in conversation with each other and forge new relationships during holiday seasons or through recreational activities held in those parks.
Secondly, the provision of communal facilities can create a positive image of the sponsoring companies. These facilities promulgate a sense that the sponsors are giving back to the community and fulfilling public promises of social responsibility. This can therefore build trust between these large companies and the local people. To cite one instance, Nostrand Ltd. , a latex manufacturer based in upstate New York, provided funding for local sports centers in various towns across the state, enabling their citizens to engage in various community-based sports. A by-product of this act is residents there now appreciate the brand and purchase the company’s products at a higher rate.
In conclusion, large companies should be encouraged to provide sports and social facilities for local communities as they can help strengthen communal bonds and promote their brand. Such facilities will continue to flourish in the near future because of these decided benefits.
There have been calls for large corporations to build
sports
and
social
facilities for the
local
communities where they operate. In my view, I would
agree
on the grounds that these facilities can strengthen communal bonds and promote a
company’s
image in a
positive
light.
Firstly
, as most
people
are
increasingly
beset with professional and familial duties, they
often
lack the time to participate in communal activities and forge meaningful connections with one another. By constructing
sports
and
social
facilities, these
companies
can grant these
people
the appropriate setting for them to participate in common activities. This is evident in cities well-known for quality of life such as Hanoi where most of the parks there have
been built
by
Vinaconex
, one of the largest
companies
in Vietnam.
Hence
, most of the
local
denizens are able to engage in conversation with each other and forge new relationships during holiday seasons or through recreational activities held in those parks.
Secondly
, the provision of communal facilities can create a
positive
image of the sponsoring
companies
. These facilities promulgate a sense that the sponsors are giving back to the community and fulfilling public promises of
social
responsibility. This can
therefore
build trust between these large
companies
and the
local
people
. To cite one instance,
Nostrand
Ltd.
,
a latex manufacturer based in upstate New York, provided funding for
local
sports
centers in various towns across the state, enabling their citizens to engage in various community-based
sports
. A by-product of this act is residents there
now
appreciate the brand and
purchase
the
company’s
products at a higher rate.
In conclusion
, large
companies
should
be encouraged
to provide
sports
and
social
facilities for
local
communities as they can
help
strengthen communal bonds and promote their brand. Such facilities will continue to flourish in the near future
because
of these decided benefits.