One of the responsibilities of a manager is to motivate their employees to increase their performance. However, I strongly disagree that baising their salaries on their rates of sales and production would be the most effective method.
The performance in many cases cannot simly be qualified in terms of sales and production. For example, a teacher's job is to teach classes, assess homework, and provide students with feedback, none of which involves producing or selling any goods. In this case it is the performance of her studence and their levels of satisfaction with aspects of her performance such as rapport or punctiality that decide how succesful he has been.
Furthermore, the performance of many workers is greately affected by external factors beyond their control. The state of economy, unexpected political development, and extreme weather conditions can all have significant impact on how much a worker can produce or sell. A hurricane, for example, can easely devastate a farm and all its produce without its workers being responsible for any of the damages or the ensuing drop in production rates. Basing wages on sales or production rates would actually demotivate workers in such cases.
Some may argue that it is difficult to assess anything other than a worker's output, making any other form of appraisal less effective. However, managers these days have tools such questionnaires and Customer Relations Management platform that allow them to form a relatively clear picture of a worker's overall performance.
In conclusion, I think deciding how much an employee should earn based solely on their sales or production figures would be both impossible and unfair im most, if not all, cases. Instead, employers should look at a more diverse set of performance indicators, including customer satisfaction and punctuality.
One of the responsibilities of a manager is to motivate their employees to increase their
performance
.
However
, I
strongly
disagree that
baising
their salaries on their rates of
sales
and
production
would be the most effective method.
The
performance
in
many
cases cannot
simly
be qualified
in terms of
sales
and
production
.
For example
, a teacher's job is to teach classes, assess homework, and provide students with feedback, none of which involves producing or selling any
goods
.
In this case
it is the
performance
of her
studence
and their levels of satisfaction with aspects of her
performance
such as rapport or
punctiality
that decide how
succesful
he has been.
Furthermore
, the
performance
of
many
workers
is
greately
affected
by external factors beyond their control. The state of economy, unexpected political development, and extreme weather conditions can all have significant impact on how much a
worker
can produce or sell. A hurricane,
for example
, can
easely
devastate a farm and all its produce without its
workers
being responsible for any of the damages or the ensuing drop in
production
rates. Basing wages on
sales
or
production
rates would actually demotivate
workers
in such cases.
Some
may
argue
that it is difficult to assess anything other than a worker's output, making any other form of appraisal less effective.
However
, managers these days have tools such questionnaires and Customer Relations Management platform that
allow
them to form a
relatively
clear
picture of a worker's
overall
performance.
In conclusion
, I
think
deciding how much an employee should earn based
solely
on their
sales
or
production
figures would be both impossible and unfair
im
most, if not all, cases.
Instead
, employers should look at a more diverse set of
performance
indicators, including customer satisfaction and punctuality.