It is argued that in some countries suffering from high rate of unemployment, providing secondary education for students is pointless since it is impossible for them to have a job in the future to come. Personally, I completely disagree with this view for many reasons.
To begin with, offering only primary education for pupils is a short-sighted point of view. Firstly, it would be extremely difficult for people without any certifications or qualifications for find a job. If they are even lucky enough to manage to get an occupation, it would only give them a meager income which will not be enough to support their life and their family. Consequently, they will become a burden to the society. Moreover, if people can only be offered with primary education, there will be a lack of employees in a number of professionals such as teachers and doctors since student are not allowed to enter higher education
Additionally, there are many reasons why higher education should be provided. The fundamental reasons is that with tertiary education, students will have more chance to acquire more knowledge that is necessary for their future career. When pupils are being well-equipped with skills which is relevant to their job prospects, they stand a higher chance of getting well-paid jobs. In addition, when people are highly educated, they can sometime create their own opportunities by creating their own firms of companies, thus offering more jobs vacancy which resulting in the reduction of unemployment rate.
In conclusion, I am completely against the view that they should only offered primary education to pupils is not a wise decision since secondary education can also be an important factors to help people get a decent job.
It
is argued
that in
some
countries suffering from high rate of unemployment, providing secondary
education
for students is pointless since it is impossible for them to have a
job
in the future to
come
.
Personally
, I completely disagree with this view for
many
reasons.
To
begin
with, offering
only
primary
education
for pupils is a short-sighted point of view.
Firstly
, it would be
extremely
difficult for
people
without any certifications or qualifications for find a
job
. If they are even lucky
enough
to manage to
get
an occupation, it would
only
give them a meager income which will not be
enough
to support their life and their family.
Consequently
, they will become a burden to the society.
Moreover
, if
people
can
only
be offered
with primary
education
, there will be a lack of employees in a number of professionals such as teachers and doctors since student are not
allowed
to enter higher education
Additionally
, there are
many
reasons why higher
education
should
be provided
. The fundamental reasons is that with tertiary
education
, students will have more chance to acquire more knowledge
that is
necessary for their future career. When pupils are being well-equipped with
skills
which is relevant to their
job
prospects, they stand a higher chance of getting well-paid
jobs
.
In addition
, when
people
are
highly
educated, they can sometime create their
own
opportunities by creating their
own
firms of
companies
,
thus
offering more
jobs
vacancy which resulting in the reduction of unemployment rate.
In conclusion
, I am completely against the view that they should
only
offered primary
education
to pupils is not a wise decision since secondary
education
can
also
be an
important
factors
to
help
people
get
a decent
job
.