Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Nuclear power is not a good energy source for the world. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Nuclear power is not a good energy source for the world. WEV9K
Nowadays, a number of developed or developing countries, such as China, Russia, USA, they use nuclear power energy. And some europe countries research new nuclear plant in poland and other new eu member. Taiwan has many nuclear plant. Japan and South korea also have nuclear power plant. Firstly, a plethora of scientiscts and researchers have been studying on this area many years. They said that ıf you check power plant regularly, you wont any damage from nuclear power. I think that, if developed countries successed in this field, we can success nuclear energy. Yes, we will spend too much money for nuclear energy, however, we will save too much money in future. I believe that, this system more reliable than HES and other old fashioned energy technologys. According to political researchers, this energy system provide some military advantages for state. İf we handle plutonium in this facility, we have nuclear bomb. That's good sign for fure of us. On the other hand, our country didn't tried this platform and energy type. If nuclear plant leaks nuclear, this situation kill to turkey. This is dangerous situation due to fact that turkey doesn't have security platform aganist nuclear red-level situation. Likewise USSR had been live this situation since 1984 in Chernoboyl. They had been extremyl effort against nuclear blast and they have lost thosund peoples. The opposite way, any countries didn't help to USSR. Finally, they build a giant wall for the nuclear power plant. Consequently, a number of developed countries have nuclear plant and they have great preventive system for nuclear leaks. May be we have a nuclear plant, it can help to reduction our energy costs. But if we dont carefully for nuclear plant, that's suicide for us.
Nowadays, a number of developed or developing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
, such as China, Russia, USA, they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
. And
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
Possible spelling mistake found.
europe
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
research new nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plant
in
Possible spelling mistake found.
poland
and other new
Possible spelling mistake found.
eu
member. Taiwan has
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plant
. Japan and
If the term is a proper noun, use initial capitals.
South korea
also
have nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
plant.

Firstly
, a plethora of
Possible spelling mistake found.
scientiscts
and researchers have been studying on this area
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
years. They said that
Possible spelling mistake found.
ıf
you
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
check
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plant
regularly
, you
Please make sure you mean 'wont' (a habit), not "won't"/"won’t" (short for 'will not')?
wont
any damage from nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
. I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that, if developed
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
Possible spelling mistake found.
successed
in this field, we
The word 'success' is a noun or an adjective. A verb or adverb is missing or misspelled here, or maybe a comma is missing.
can success
nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
. Yes, we will spend too much money for nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
,
however
, we will save too much money
Did you mean: "in the future"?
in future
. I believe that, this system more reliable than HES and other
This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
old fashioned
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
Possible spelling mistake. Did you mean "technologies", the plural form of the noun 'technology'?
technologys
.

According to political researchers, this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
system provide
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
military advantages for state.
Possible spelling mistake found.
İf
we handle plutonium in this facility, we have nuclear bomb. That's g
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ood
s
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ign
for
Possible spelling mistake found.
fure
of us.

O
n the other hand,
our
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
didn't
The verb 'didn't' requires base form of this verb: "try"
tried
this platform and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
type. If nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plant
leaks nuclear, this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
situation
kill to turkey. This is d
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
angerous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
situation
due to fact that turkey doesn't have security platform
Possible spelling mistake found.
aganist
nuclear red-level
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
situation
. L
ikewise
USSR had been l
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ive
this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
situation
since 1984 in
Possible spelling mistake found.
Chernoboyl
. They had been
Possible spelling mistake found.
extremyl
effort against nuclear
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
blast and
they have lost
Possible spelling mistake found.
thosund
peoples. The opposite way, any
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
didn't h
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
elp
to USSR. F
inally,
they build a giant wall for the nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
plant.

C
onsequently,
a number of developed
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
have nuclear
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
plant and
they have great preventive system for nuclear leaks.
Did you mean "maybe" (= perhaps)?
May be
we have a nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plant
, it can h
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
elp
to reduction our
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
costs. B
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
ut
if we
Possible spelling mistake found
dont
carefully
for nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plant
, that's suicide for us.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Nuclear power is not a good energy source for the world.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
288 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts