Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand. Do you support the use for constructive purposes?

Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand. Do you support the use for constructive purposes? Lw2Wp
In this current era of modernization, few individuals believe that the only source that could compensate for the burgeoning demands of energy is Nuclear. I, however, choose to see eye-to-eye with them, and the reasons to prove my stance are elucidated in the ensuing paragraphs. To commence with, there are a few of the factors that favor the use of Nuclear energy. Firstly, if implemented, it will have a tremendous positive impact on regimes' finances since the cost of operation is extremely low when distinguished from other natural resources like Coal, Gas, and Oil. Few researchers also give credence to the fact that this source of energy noticeably has a low risk of inflation. To clarify this, it does not have many fluctuations in the market. For an instance, States reported that, in 2019, there was a roughly 7 percent inflation in price index of several natural resources like Coal, whereas, the price index showed a stabilized inflation of approximately 0. 5 percent for Fussion energy. Hence, Fission Power helps the higher authorities of the nation in more than one way. Furthermore, there are a few more favors for Atomic energy. This energy is completely unaffected from various external climatic factors like Wind and Solar. Justifying it, if there is a cloudy day, then there are less chances of Solar energy generation on that particular day, while, Nuclear Fusion Power is entirely free from those environmental factors. Additionally, a study conducted on Thermonuclear energy in the UK, in 2020, suggested that it is 8000 times (not precisely) more efficient source of energy as compared to the traditional energy sources. Henceforth, Nuclear Fission energy is, in its own way, more fruitful source of energy production. To sum up it can be commented that, no sooner does this source of energy is chosen for meeting up the surging demands of energy, than it will turn out to be fruitful to the nation because it has; minimal operational cost; least risk of inflation; no climatic limitations and; more efficiency than Coal, Oil, and Gas combined.
In this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
era of modernization, few individuals believe that the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
that could compensate for the burgeoning demands of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
is Nuclear. I,
however
, choose to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
eye-to-eye with them, and the reasons to prove my stance
are elucidated
in the ensuing paragraphs.

To commence with, there are a few of the factors that favor the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of Nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
.
Firstly
, if implemented, it will have a tremendous
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
impact on regimes' finances since the cost of operation is
extremely
low when distinguished from other natural resources like Coal, Gas, and Oil. Few researchers
also
give credence to the fact that this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
noticeably
has a low
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
risk
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
inflation
. To clarify this, it does not have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
fluctuations in the market. For an instance, States reported that, in 2019, there was a roughly 7 percent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
inflation
in price index of several natural resources like Coal, whereas, the price index
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
a stabilized
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
inflation
of approximately 0. 5 percent for
Possible spelling mistake found.
Fussion
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
.
Hence
, Fission Power
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
the higher authorities of the nation in more than one way.

Furthermore
, there are a few more favors for Atomic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
. This
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
is completely unaffected from various external climatic factors like Wind and Solar. Justifying it, if there is a cloudy day, then there are
Did you mean "fewer"? The noun chances is countable.
less
chances of Solar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
generation on that particular day, while, Nuclear Fusion Power is
entirely
free from those environmental factors.
Additionally
, a study conducted on Thermonuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
in the UK, in 2020, suggested that it is 8000 times (not
precisely
) more efficient
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
as compared to the traditional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
. Henceforth, Nuclear Fission
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
is, in its
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
way, more fruitful
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
production.

To sum up it can
be commented
that, no sooner does this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
is chosen
for meeting up the surging demands of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
, than it will turn out to be fruitful to the nation
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it has; minimal operational cost;
A determiner is probably missing here: "the least".
least
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
risk
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
inflation
; no climatic limitations and; more efficiency than Coal, Oil, and Gas combined.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand. Do you support the use for constructive purposes?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
342 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts