It is often considered that knowledge should be available for everyone and easily accessible for anyone. However, some people believe that should not be the case and information should be treated like assets. This essay will be comparing the advantages and disadvantages of both views.
First, sharing the knowledge in fields like science could lead to faster and better results. For instance, making researches from a company that studied a disease available for other researchers can have positive effects in going further from where the company stopped, or even discovering new information about the subject studied. Hence, in my opinion is the best choice if humanity wants to quickly progress.
Second, publishing information could be harmful in some fields like businesses. For example, sharing a successful company's business model will have a nigative impact on firm, because other business will copy their model and start catching up. On the other hand, it can be a matter of leaving healthier or not for people, like when a company discovered the gene responsible for breast cancer and made a device to test people. Although it was a great discovery the purpose of it was really making money, the company start charging 3000 dollars per test which is extremely difficult to pay for some people.
In conclusion, weather we share information or not it will have both good effects and side effects, but is it really comparable?
It is
often
considered that knowledge should be available for everyone and
easily
accessible for anyone.
However
,
some
people
believe that should not be the case and
information
should
be treated
like assets. This essay will be comparing the advantages and disadvantages of both views.
First
, sharing the knowledge in fields like science could lead to faster and better results.
For instance
, making researches from a
company
that studied a disease available for other researchers can have
positive
effects in going
further
from where the
company
stopped
, or even discovering new
information
about the subject studied.
Hence
, in my opinion is the best choice if humanity wants to
quickly
progress.
Second, publishing
information
could be harmful in
some
fields like businesses.
For example
, sharing a successful
company
's business model will have a
nigative
impact on firm,
because
other business will copy their model and
start
catching up.
On the other hand
, it can be a matter of leaving healthier or not for
people
, like when a
company
discovered the gene responsible for breast cancer and made a device to
test
people
. Although it was a great discovery the purpose of it was
really
making money, the
company
start
charging 3000 dollars per
test
which is
extremely
difficult to pay for
some
people
.
In conclusion
, weather we share
information
or not it will have both
good
effects and side effects,
but
is it
really
comparable?