Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Nowadays people are using more consumer goods. Do you think it has more positive approach then negative?

Nowadays people are using more consumer goods. Do you think it has more positive approach then negative? GlXbm

These days more domestic products are used by the individuals. I opine that this is largely opposed due to increasing the burden on pocket of the consumer and very hazardous consequences for the environment although it leads the people into comfort zone. Over dependency upon these product is one of the most prominent negative impact on the people. Most of the person using the products in such a way that they can't do the same work by another way which leads to more dependency upon that products. Apart from that, when consumer start more consuming these products then they relatively increased the the expenses of the individuals which creates heavy burden and pressure on the pocket of every consumer. Beside this, when residents using more domestic goods then there is more hazard to the environment, which is contributed by the everyone who consume that products. Moreover, when the consumption of these products increase in the society then anyone use the product and throw it without their use in another way and taking their opportunity as a a renewable source of energy. In spite of many pitfalls, it is undeniable that there are some positive impacts also of using these consumer goods like when everyone use these products in the society then it leads to them in a comfort zone and they can complete their task easily without engage too much energy. It would be re-itreated that this trend only put hazard on environment but also make the individual lethargic. Nevertheless, the advantage of this trend can't be overlook.

These days more domestic You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
products
 are This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 by the individuals. I opine that this is largely
 opposed due to increasing the burden on pocket of the consumer and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 hazardous consequences for the environment although it leads the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 into comfort zone.

Over dependency upon these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
product
 is one of the most prominent This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 impact on the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
. Most of the person using the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
products
 in such a way that they can't do the same work by another way which leads to more dependency upon that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
products
. Apart from that, when consumer This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiate
start
 more consuming these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
products
 then they relatively
 increased Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only "the" or "the" is left.the
the the
 expenses of the individuals which creates heavy burden and pressure on the pocket of every consumer.

Beside this, when residents using more domestic This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
Did you mean "than"?than
then
 there is more hazard to the environment, which is contributed
 by Possible typo. Did you mean "the" or "everyone"?theeveryone
the everyone
 who consume that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
products
. Moreover
, when the consumption of these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
products
 increase in the society then anyone The pronoun 'anyone' is usually used with a third-person or a past tense verb: "uses", "used".usesused
use
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
product
 and throw it without their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 in another way and taking their opportunity as Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only "a" or "a" is left.a
a a
 renewable source of energy.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:notwithstanding
In spite of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 pitfalls, it is undeniable that there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:beneficial
positive
 impacts also
 of using these consumer This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
 like when everyone Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: "uses".uses
use
 these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
products
 in the society then it leads to them in a comfort Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).zone, and
zone and
 they can complete their task easily
 without engage too much energy.

It would be Possible spelling mistake found.retreatedreiterated
re-itreated
 that this trend This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 put hazard on environment This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 the individual lethargic. Nevertheless
, the advantage of this trend can't be Consider using a past participle here: "overlooked".overlooked
overlook
. 