Nowadays it is noticed that cultural mixing is reflected within local  cultural practices. 
Do you think it is good for our society?
Nowadays it is noticed that cultural mixing is reflected within local cultural practices. Do you think it is good for our society? 6xaBx
In this era of globalization, boundaries –political, geographical, cultural–are being removed as peoples blend and persons share, with each other, the very values that once segregated them. Cultural mixing has begun tearing down all the ethnical and racial pigeonholes and move us closer, by the day, towards one universal race of humans. Like all else, even this has its occasional downsides, which, when put in comparison with the upsides, are negligible.
Firstly, we have to consider that cultural mixing is perhaps the only non-coercive way to move global humanity towards ideal equality, a belief sought for by all the great persons, and political and religious ideologies. While many have struggled throughout human history to uproot tyranny, oppression, bigotry and segregation, their paths have been tainted by the blood of the bold and tears of the beautiful. True that we, through our ravaging revolutions, have progressed, but at a cost that undoubtedly has been dear. Cultural mixing, on the other hand, is the benedictory prophet, who ushers the great communion of all men in empathy, leaving behind all ethos, and he comes only in peace.
Yet, some conservatives argue that free-mixing of cultural values degrade people’s sense of morality. They must be conveniently forgetful of all the immoralities, in the name of conservation, that evidently have tarnished human history. Although, it is undeniable that cultural mixing, like any other progressive enterprise, has coincided with social unpleasantries, for example declining stability among families in the third world countries, the blame has not yet been rationally put. And, of course, there are many other socio-economic controllers such as wage-earning, and individualism that may very well be responsible for today’s social ills.
In sum, we must not be closed-minded to the global brethren cultures, because, only by doing this we may, one day, realize the ever-cherished dreamland of universal humanity, where “… all the people, sharing the world in peace” will not be only a thing of imagination. 
In this era of globalization, boundaries –political, geographical, cultural–are  
being removed
 as peoples blend and persons share, with each  
other
, the  
very
 values that once segregated them.  
Cultural
  mixing
 has begun tearing down all the ethnical and racial pigeonholes and  
move
 us closer, by the day, towards one universal race of humans. Like all else, even this has its occasional downsides, which, when put  
in comparison
 with the upsides, are negligible. 
Firstly
, we  
have to
 consider that  
cultural
  mixing
 is perhaps the  
only
 non-coercive way to  
move
 global humanity towards ideal equality, a belief sought for by all the great persons, and political and religious ideologies. While  
many
 have struggled throughout human history to uproot tyranny, oppression, bigotry and segregation, their paths have  
been tainted
 by the blood of the bold and tears of the  
beautiful
. True that we, through our ravaging revolutions, have progressed,  
but
 at a cost that  
undoubtedly
 has been dear.  
Cultural
  mixing
, on the  
other
 hand, is the benedictory prophet, who ushers the great communion of all  
men
 in empathy, leaving behind all ethos, and he  
comes
  only
 in peace. 
Yet
,  
some
 conservatives argue that free-mixing of  
cultural
 values degrade  
people
’s sense of morality. They  
must
 be  
conveniently
 forgetful of all the immoralities, in the name of conservation, that  
evidently
 have tarnished human history. Although, it is undeniable that  
cultural
  mixing
, like any  
other
 progressive enterprise, has coincided with social unpleasantries,  
for example
 declining stability among families in the third world countries, the blame has not  
yet
 been  
rationally
 put. And,  
of course
, there are  
many
  other
  socio-economic
 controllers such as wage-earning, and individualism that may  
very
 well be responsible for  
today
’s social ills.
In sum, we  
must
 not  
be closed
-minded to the global brethren cultures,  
because
,  
only
 by doing this we may, one day, realize the ever-cherished dreamland of universal humanity, where “… all the  
people
, sharing the world in peace” will not be  
only
 a thing of imagination.