Today, celebrities earn higher wages than politicians. It seems to me that this is the consequence of Advancement in technology and marketing, and it is a positive development because the community could be profited by entertainers' investment economically. In this essay, the reasons for this issue and its effects on society will be discussed.
Fists, popularization might be one of the critical factors to become wealthier due to the growth in the entertainment industry. For instance, it is notable that some of the sportsmen such as Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi are much wealthier than many of the governors. Since the entertainers are followed by an extended age range of individuals (from children to older adults) in comparison with a limited range in politicians, this fact could help them to become more popular and wealthy. Therefore, celebrities could be the pioneers in establishing charities and foster public attention, by their reputation, to take participate in these organizations, which might be a beneficial movement in the community.
Second, the marketing development and advertisement industry are two substantial sources of money in societies. Politicians could work in just their fields; however, entertainers have acted in both their fields and advertisements. As an example, many leading brand businesses such as Addidas and Chanel, have hired celebrities for advertising their latest products. Entertainers could gain people's trust and persuade them to purchase the companies' products because of their well-known reputation. As a result, celebrities could be involved in societies' financial flourishing in which politicians could not. Also, the community might take advantage of the effective role of entertainers to advertise some positive habits among individuals for getting a promotion culturally.
In summary, it might be said that earning more money in entertainers than politicians has a negative effect because it is politicians who play a significant role in the future of society. However, it seems that the effects of this approach appear to be overwhelmingly positive, and its noticeable economical impacts of the public are undeniable.
Today
,
celebrities
earn higher wages than
politicians
. It seems to me that this is the consequence of Advancement in technology and marketing, and it is a
positive
development
because
the community could
be profited
by entertainers' investment
economically
. In this essay, the reasons for this issue and its effects on society will
be discussed
.
Fists, popularization
might
be one of the critical factors to become wealthier due to the growth in the entertainment industry.
For instance
, it is notable that
some of the
sportsmen such as Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi are much wealthier than
many
of the governors. Since the
entertainers
are followed
by an extended age range of individuals (from children to older adults)
in comparison
with a limited range in
politicians
, this fact could
help
them to become more popular and wealthy.
Therefore
,
celebrities
could be the pioneers in establishing charities and foster public attention, by their reputation, to take participate in these organizations, which
might
be a beneficial movement in the community.
Second, the marketing development and advertisement industry are two substantial sources of money in societies.
Politicians
could work in
just
their fields;
however
,
entertainers
have acted in both their fields and advertisements. As an example,
many
leading brand businesses such as
Addidas
and Chanel, have hired
celebrities
for advertising their latest products.
Entertainers
could gain
people
's trust and persuade them to
purchase
the
companies
' products
because
of their well-known reputation.
As a result
,
celebrities
could
be involved
in societies' financial flourishing in which
politicians
could not.
Also
, the community
might
take advantage of the effective role of
entertainers
to advertise
some
positive
habits among individuals for getting a promotion
culturally
.
In summary, it
might
be said
that earning more money in
entertainers
than
politicians
has a
negative
effect
because
it is
politicians
who play a significant role in the future of society.
However
, it seems that the effects of this approach appear to be
overwhelmingly
positive
, and its noticeable economical impacts of the public are undeniable.