Advertisements are focusing more on children, which are potential consumers to enhance enterprises’ revenue. It is a matter of great controversy as parents are against the purpose of advertising, while marketers believe that their contents contained valuable information. This essay will provide a precise discussion about both views.
On the one hand, commercials have included valid information about their products. First, accurate information helps companies to approach their target clients so that consumers can easily decide on what to buy. The more useful the information is, the better the profit is. If the advertisements were identified as incorrect information, their companies would be faced with the hazard of significant financial fines and losing the brand reputation due to consumers’ protection law. Therefore, parents can put their faith in advertising and allow children to watch it, whereas companies continue to attract kids.
On the other hand, parents ought to oppose it since the inevitable burden on children is even greater. Furthermore, businesses manipulated consumers’ choices to purchase their products through advertisements. Likewise, having watching numerous commercials, children tend to pester or nag parents to buy toys, snacks, and other goods causing bad behavior to children. Not having clear knowledge about advertisements, naive minors might be persuaded to buy invalid food, which can put their health at risk with many potential diseases such as obesity and diabetes. . .
In conclusion, despite the informative content of advertising, the lifelong detrimental of putting such pressure on children is much more horrendous. I assume children should not watch too many advertisements in order to preclude the burden.
Advertisements
are focusing more on
children
, which are potential
consumers
to enhance enterprises’ revenue. It is a matter of great controversy as
parents
are against the purpose of advertising, while marketers believe that their contents contained valuable
information
. This essay will provide a precise discussion about both views.
On the one hand, commercials have included valid
information
about their products.
First
, accurate
information
helps
companies
to approach their target clients
so
that
consumers
can
easily
decide on what to
buy
. The more useful the
information
is, the better the profit is. If the
advertisements
were identified
as incorrect
information
, their
companies
would
be faced
with the hazard of significant financial fines and losing the brand reputation due to
consumers’
protection law.
Therefore
,
parents
can put their faith in advertising and
allow
children
to
watch
it, whereas
companies
continue to attract kids.
On the other hand
,
parents
ought to oppose it since the inevitable burden on
children
is even greater.
Furthermore
, businesses manipulated
consumers’
choices to
purchase
their products through
advertisements
.
Likewise
, having watching numerous commercials,
children
tend to pester or nag
parents
to
buy
toys, snacks, and other
goods
causing
bad
behavior to
children
. Not having
clear
knowledge about
advertisements
, naive minors might
be persuaded
to
buy
invalid food, which can put their health at
risk
with
many
potential diseases such as obesity and diabetes.
.
.
In conclusion
, despite the informative content of advertising, the lifelong detrimental of putting such pressure on
children
is much more horrendous. I assume
children
should not
watch
too
many
advertisements
in order to preclude the burden.