Museums play a crucial role in preserving the culture and foster tradition of any country whereas, the advancement of technology is another source to get the knowledge of any historical places, creative work and art galleries, However, we can not replace public museums with any new technology because this could only work as a supplement. Hence. I quite disagree with the given statement.
On the one hand, electronic media can never diminish the significance of the public museums and art galleries because images, videos of any historical places, objects, creative work and art have no comparison with the real things although computers have plethora of information regarding these things but visiting such places give you total different experience and exposure. For example, In Pakistan there is Makli graveyard, a historical monument has a beautiful and ancient architecture. Visiting and getting info from the internet are two different feelings and experience.
In addition, Historical places are the biggest source of exchange of different ideas, culture and opens the way to meet with various people that enhances the value of the country as well as promotes communication and interaction between them. People from different states travel to visit such kind of places to gather information, knowledge and gives gratifying experience. It is the best opportunity to learn through diverse cultures and traditions and even they follow too. For instance, William and Kate had been seen recently in the visit to Pakistan and its historical places, not only this they even there traditional values which was phenomenal.
To sum up, museums have its own worth that we cannot replace with modern technology through computers. It has an abundance of information, but visiting physically gives totally different meanings.
Museums
play a crucial role in preserving the culture and foster tradition of any country whereas, the advancement of technology is another source to
get
the knowledge of any
historical
places
, creative work and art galleries,
However
, we can not replace public
museums
with any new technology
because
this could
only
work as a supplement.
Hence
. I quite disagree with the
given
statement.
On the one hand, electronic media can never diminish the significance of the public
museums
and art galleries
because
images, videos of any
historical
places
, objects, creative work and art have no comparison with the real things although computers have plethora of information regarding these things
but
visiting such
places
give you total
different
experience and exposure.
For example
, In Pakistan there is
Makli
graveyard, a
historical
monument has a
beautiful
and ancient architecture. Visiting and getting info from the internet are two
different
feelings and experience.
In addition
,
Historical
places
are the biggest source of exchange of
different
ideas
, culture and opens the way to
meet
with various
people
that enhances the value of the country
as well
as promotes communication and interaction between them.
People
from
different
states travel to visit such kind of
places
to gather information, knowledge and gives gratifying experience. It is the best opportunity to learn through diverse cultures and traditions and even they follow too.
For instance
, William and Kate had been
seen
recently in the visit to Pakistan and its
historical
places
, not
only
this they even there traditional values which was phenomenal.
To sum up,
museums
have its
own
worth that we cannot replace with modern technology through computers. It has an abundance of information,
but
visiting
physically
gives
totally
different
meanings.