It is highly common that leadership positions are occupied by people in older age
bracket, however some prefer young leaders for leadership roles. I completely disagree with
this opinion as I personally believe older leaders bring higher value to the table.
The principle reason for holding on to my viewpoint is that age is an important aspect
of people’s perception of leaders. In organizations, leaders with several years of experience
are generally considered highly valuable by others as they can offer prudential guidance.
Therefore, subordinates tend to look up to aged leaders with wisdom as a role model whilst
holding the perception that young leaders are immature.
A further reason for my opinion is experience is the teacher of all things, a
prerequisite for leadership roles. It is of paramount importance that the organization is being
led by veteran managers with deep knowledge of industry in which they are operating. Most
specifically, young leaders often lack strategic perceptive as the ability to look far forward
can only be strengthened by past experiences and lessons learnt.
Lastly, while younger managers are relentless in their pursuit of perfection, they may
stretch team members beyond their reach. On the other hand, their experienced
counterparts thrive on challenges as they are risk-adverse, setting feasible goals and they do
not seek validation from other people. Challenging the status quo is important; however, it is
crucial for a leader to effectively spearhead the followers without putting intolerable pressure
on them.
In conclusion, it is my firm believe that young people are not suitable for managerial
roles. It is because people highly perceived older people as leaders, leading without
experience would be tantamount to failure, and younger leaders may wear teammates out
with unrealistic goals. Given this situation, it is recommended that age should still be an
important factor when considering someone for leadership role.
It is
highly
common that
leadership
positions
are occupied
by
people
in older age
bracket,
however
some
prefer
young
leaders
for
leadership
roles
. I completely disagree with
this opinion as I
personally
believe older
leaders
bring higher value to the table.
The
principle
reason for holding on to my viewpoint is that age is an
important
aspect
of
people’s
perception of
leaders
. In organizations,
leaders
with several years of experience
are
generally
considered
highly
valuable by others as they can offer prudential guidance.
Therefore
, subordinates tend to look up to aged
leaders
with wisdom as a
role
model whilst
holding the perception that
young
leaders
are immature.
A
further
reason for my opinion is experience is the teacher of all things, a
prerequisite for
leadership
roles
. It is of paramount importance that the organization is
being
led
by veteran managers with deep knowledge of industry in which they are operating. Most
specifically
,
young
leaders
often
lack strategic perceptive as the ability to look far forward
can
only
be strengthened
by
past experiences
and lessons
learnt
.
Lastly
, while younger managers are relentless in their pursuit of perfection, they may
stretch team members beyond their reach.
On the other hand
, their experienced
counterparts thrive on challenges as they are
risk
-adverse, setting feasible
goals and
they do
not seek validation from other
people
. Challenging the status quo is
important
;
however
, it is
crucial for a
leader
to
effectively
spearhead the followers without putting intolerable pressure
on them.
In conclusion
, it is my firm believe that
young
people
are not suitable for managerial
roles. It is
because
people
highly
perceived older
people
as
leaders
, leading without
experience would be tantamount to failure, and younger
leaders
may wear teammates out
with unrealistic goals.
Given
this situation, it
is recommended
that age should
still
be an
important
factor when considering someone for
leadership
role
.