Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person. Do you think this is the best way to do it, or are there better alternatives? What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person. Do you think this is the best way to do it, or are there better alternatives? What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion? gVyd
It is considered that employer have various other better alternatives to hire people for the various positions in the company rather than just taking interviews to appoint people for the jobs. In my perception, I agree with this statement. Th primary reason is that if the employer uses different methods to hire people, he can know better what are the abilities and skills the person attained which he will use in the position for which he is applying. This will make employer to choose appropriate candidate for the job position. It will be profitable for the company, whereas it will be very easy for the new employee to adjust with his new job. While, there are various alternatives to choose people for instance: taking test which could be written and verbal test to get an Idea that which candidate have more knowledge, otherwise the company will hire less capable person which will affect the company performance which will lead to ineffectiveness and inefficiency in the work and this will lead to delays in accomplishing the work on time. Moreover, the companies who take test make them to learn about the confidence of the individual, whereas this way they judge the thinking capacity of the individual. This makes job applicants to sharpen their skills and abilities before applying for the job, although when the competitive person got selected, he aspires more remuneration. In Conclusion, the employer should take test to check the skills and abilities of the people to hire right people for the vacant job position in order to hire suitable and right candidate for the right position in order to help the company to grow and make person easy to adjust with new working environment
It
is considered
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employer
have various other better alternatives to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
hire
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
for the various
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
positions
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
rather
than
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
taking interviews to appoint
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jobs
. In my perception, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with this statement.

Make sure that 'Th' is the chemical symbol for thorium, and not a typing error. Did you mean "The"?
Th
primary reason is that if the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employer
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
uses
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
methods to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
hire
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
, he can know better what are the abilities and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
attained which he will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
position
for which he is applying. This will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employer
to choose appropriate candidate for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
position
. It will be profitable for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
, whereas it will be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
easy for the new employee to adjust with his new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
. While, there are various alternatives to choose
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
for instance
: taking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
test
which could
be written
and verbal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
test
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
an
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Idea
that which candidate have more knowledge,
otherwise
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
hire
less capable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
which will affect the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
performance which will lead to ineffectiveness and inefficiency in the work and this will lead to delays in accomplishing the work on time.

Moreover
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
who take
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
test
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
them to learn about the confidence of the individual, whereas this way they judge the thinking capacity of the individual.
Did you mean "these"?
This
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
makes
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
applicants to sharpen their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
and abilities
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
applying for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
, although when the competitive
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
got
selected, he aspires more remuneration.

In Conclusion
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employer
should take
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
test
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
check
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
and abilities of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
hire
right
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
for the vacant
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
position
in order to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
hire
suitable and right candidate for the right
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
position
in order to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
to grow and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
easy to adjust with new working environment
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person. Do you think this is the best way to do it, or are there better alternatives? What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
285 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts